the devils reject movie is this a horror movie or a soft core porno

S

slidecage

CAGiversary!
Feedback
106 (100%)
hell got this off netflix this week and the first 30 mins to hour i didnt know if i was watching horror movie or a porno movie ... i was let down big time on this movie . the first one was alot better then this.






MIGHT BE SOME SPOLIERS I DONT THINK THERE IS BUT SOME MIGHT SO STOP READING THIS IF YOU DIDNT SEE IT


























Did have one question though. when the took everyone out of the farm house why would the leave the cows behind. they would came back and took the cows away they just wouldnt leave them to stave to death..

also i think the first movie was made with less money but looked better this one just didnt have anything to do with the first one at all.. i mean you got what 3 or 5 people killed

2 got shot
1 got stabbed
1 got head hammered in???

and 1 got hit by semi



and what happened to the Doctor ?

movie was very poorly made
 
Yea when I saw this I was expecting it to be more of a gorey killer movie. Sure it was but like you said there where a lot of softer core porn in it. Not a bad movie but It could have been better. Brak should be posting here soon I think he liked it al ot.
 
I thought this movie was much better than the first one. Not really "scary", but still entertaining. The semi truck scene is great.
 
[quote name='Kain Vincent']Is there ANYTHING THAT YOU LIKE? Alot of your posts that I see, it's always something you hate (Netflix, Blockbuster, etc.)[/QUOTE]

just saying it seems once they start giving more and more money to make other parts of movies they ruin it. Look at this , the first one was 100x better.. Look at Blair witch the first one was very good so they tossed millions to make a second one and that sucked big time. And I dont even remember seeing cows on the farm in the first one. I could of swear the house was more in a woods like setting but this one was just out in the open....

some movies i seen in the last few months i liked

undead - even though alot of people said it sucked it was better then i hoped
boo--- again very good show in what it cost to make it
house of wax--- again very good show in what it cost to make plot was okay
batman begins---- was better then i thought it would been
robots---- cute family movie
12 dogs of xmas---- again cute family movie


there are 6 movies i rented in the last month i liked : )
 
[quote name='mykevermin']spoilers, ya' shitstain![/QUOTE]


there i broke it up i dont think there are any i gave away....







SPOLIER AGAIN I GUESS

















what happen to the doctor
 
Well, it's good to see you are not so hateful after all. ;)

[quote name='slidecage']just saying it seems once they start giving more and more money to make other parts of movies they ruin it. Look at this , the first one was 100x better.. Look at Blair witch the first one was very good so they tossed millions to make a second one and that sucked big time. And I dont even remember seeing cows on the farm in the first one. I could of swear the house was more in a woods like setting but this one was just out in the open....

some movies i seen in the last few months i liked

undead - even though alot of people said it sucked it was better then i hoped
boo--- again very good show in what it cost to make it
house of wax--- again very good show in what it cost to make plot was okay
batman begins---- was better then i thought it would been
robots---- cute family movie
12 dogs of xmas---- again cute family movie


there are 6 movies i rented in the last month i liked : )[/QUOTE]
 
I'll just quote myself from the last movie thread:

[quote name='sblymnlcrymnl']fucking brilliant. Few movies these actually make you care about the characters, but somehow this one did. That's quite a feat, considering that they're mass murderers. :lol:

It was also funny as hell. :lol:[/QUOTE]
 
The Devil's Rejects (intentionally) harkens back to the exploitation flicks of the '70s -- which is pretty cool, as those films were (generally) poorly done and poorly acted; where this film suceeded, creating a nice, creative contradiction in subject matter to execution.

And what sblymnl said is correct. The mentioned point brings a higher meaning to such a light-hearted "slasher flick", challenging the viewers' minds.

And, yes; very funny movie.

And, yes; this is a horror film. Look up "horror" in the dictionary -- horror is a feeling, not always ghosts and goblins.

When I saw this in theatres, people were running out of the theatre during the more grittier scenes. Pretty funny.
 
Good movie IMO one of my all times favorites. I have a question for slidecage did you see house of 1,000. That had way way more nudity and sexual shit in it then rejects. If I remeber right this one was done on a lower budget then HO1kC.
 
[quote name='Brak']The Devil's Rejects (intentionally) harkens back to the exploitation flicks of the '70s -- which is pretty cool, as those films were (generally) poorly done and poorly acted; where this film suceeded, creating a nice, creative contradiction in subject matter to execution.

And what sblymnl said is correct. The mentioned point brings a higher meaning to such a light-hearted "slasher flick", challenging the viewers' minds.

And, yes; very funny movie.

And, yes; this is a horror film. Look up "horror" in the dictionary -- horror is a feeling, not always ghosts and goblins.

When I saw this in theatres, people were running out of the theatre during the more grittier scenes. Pretty funny.[/QUOTE]



what grittier scenes???????


quote
I have a question for slidecage did you see house of 1,000. That had way way more nudity and sexual shit in it then rejects

i do not recall seeing much nudity in the first one. then again it might been nudity in it Rejects had sex sex and more sex in it ... Im just saying the first 30 mins was more of a prono movie sex,sex, naked naked, ect then the last hour it got into the plot.... It was like we know our movie sucks so if we shows these people some naked people in the first 30 mins they will be watching to the end
 
[quote name='slidecage']what grittier scenes???????[/QUOTE]

SPOILER!














When Otis smashed the guys genitals and head in with the stick, when Otis got his hands nailed to the chair and when Otis got the nails pulled out of his hand.

The scene where Otis molests the Banjo and Sullivan wife (I forget whose wife, specifically), I've never heard a theatre get that quiet.
 
[quote name='Brak']SPOILER!
When Otis smashed the guys genitals and head in with the stick, when Otis got his hands nailed to the chair and when Otis got the nails pulled out of his hand.

The scene where Otis molests the Banjo and Sullivan wife (I forget whose wife, specifically), I've never heard a theatre get that quiet.[/QUOTE]

You should have been in the theater my friend and I were in, we were laughing. Such a poorly done movie, but I didn't expect anything from it. We had a good time singing to freebird at the end.

Oops, I may have ruined it for everyone. Sorry, but freebird is in the end of the movie and its the best part of it. Actually just go listen to freebird and save yourself the 90 minutes. Well, 78 minutes, how long is freebird like 10-12 min?
 
[quote name='brendan424']You should have been in the theater my friend and I were in, we were laughing. Such a poorly done movie, but I didn't expect anything from it. We had a good time singing to freebird at the end.[/QUOTE]

Yeah. That'd been cool. I'd have felt inspired to stab you both in the parking lot.
 
[quote name='brendan424']You should have been in the theater my friend and I were in, we were laughing. Such a poorly done movie, but I didn't expect anything from it. We had a good time singing to freebird at the end.

Oops, I may have ruined it for everyone. Sorry, but freebird is in the end of the movie and its the best part of it. Actually just go listen to freebird and save yourself the 90 minutes. Well, 78 minutes, how long is freebird like 10-12 min?[/QUOTE]

you sound like a douche bag, which you probably are.
 
[quote name='Brak']SPOILER!














When Otis smashed the guys genitals and head in with the stick,

i dont think that was that gory

when Otis got his hands nailed to the chair and when Otis got the nails pulled out of his hand.

saw worse then that in the passion of the christ movie again nothing new there


The scene where Otis molests the Banjo and Sullivan wife (I forget whose wife, specifically), I've never heard a theatre get that quiet.[/QUOTE]

probally cause everyone though it was done in poor taste it didnt bring one thing to the movie ,,, well beside to show that maybe the director is a prev.


after the first 30 mins or so there was no sex or nudity so i still think they knew they had a poor ass movie but thought if we toss all this sex in the front part people will stay.... Im glad i never paid 7 to see it in the theather
 
[quote name='slidecage']probally cause everyone though it was done in poor taste it didnt bring one thing to the movie ,,, well beside to show that maybe the director is a prev.


after the first 30 mins or so there was no sex or nudity so i still think they knew they had a poor ass movie but thought if we toss all this sex in the front part people will stay.... Im glad i never paid 7 to see it in the theather[/QUOTE]

I like how you think your opinion is fact.

Good job!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top