DestroVega
CAGiversary!
Just my opinion. And I didn't see the entire thing so I can't fully stand behind what I said anyway.Stop being wrong.
Just my opinion. And I didn't see the entire thing so I can't fully stand behind what I said anyway.Stop being wrong.
The lead actress was annoying. The story was barely different from past horror movies. Nothing about it outside of gore elevated it above your average movie. There was no back story to the characters. The whole we gotta keep her here thing to get her off drugs was stupid and an obvious cop out story wise. The brother's actions/dialogue did not match up to the circumstances, he shouldn't have been defending people who were clearly possessed andStop being wrong.
The lead actress was annoying. The story was barely different from past horror movies. Nothing about it outside of gore elevated it above your average movie. There was no back story to the characters. The whole we gotta keep her here thing to get her off drugs was stupid and an obvious cop out story wise. The brother's actions/dialogue did not match up to the circumstances, he shouldn't have been defending people who were clearly possessed anded up. All it did good was gore. Everything else was below avg to avg.
Wasn't it totally different than the trailer made it out to be? Thought it's be about a night in he Cabin then BAM! Total curveball.Cabin in the Woods - 2/5
The lead actress was annoying. The story was barely different from past horror movies. Nothing about it outside of gore elevated it above your average movie. There was no back story to the characters. The whole we gotta keep her here thing to get her off drugs was stupid and an obvious cop out story wise. The brother's actions/dialogue did not match up to the circumstances, he shouldn't have been defending people who were clearly possessed anded up. All it did good was gore. Everything else was below avg to avg.
The first one IS bad, you're right. That's why 2 was made as if 1 never happened, it was kind of a redo. And 2 is the shit, it's one of my favorite movies.I liked the remake. On the other hand, quite controversiallly, I thought the original was laughabley bad. Don't see why people like it so much, must be nostalgia. 2 was ok, army of darkness was fun though.
If you are judging Gravity on character development and story, you aren't looking at it correctly.
Maybe I would've thought so too if it hadn't been the last horror movie I watched after many in October.k I thought it was a solid movie.
Sure was. Definitely scores points for being original.Wasn't it totally different than the trailer made it out to be? Thought it's be about a night in he Cabin then BAM! Total curveball.
No but it's like saying the characters weren't developed in Bad Grandpa. Certain movies are obviously going for something that isn't the normal story, character, pace, etc mission.I just don't know what to even say to this. Isn't this why we watch movies? Or have we gone a step back and just admire all the pretty colors?
Anyways, White House Down - 3/5. Good action and premise and it also had some laughs.
No but it's like saying the characters weren't developed in Bad Grandpa. Certain movies are obviously going for something that isn't the normal story, character, pace, etc mission.
Gravity is a marvel in CGI/3D/green screen tech that makes you think you're actually watching people in space. It's a total marvel and no shock it took 4 years to make. No surprise when it's nominated for Best Picture with Bullock getting a Best Actress nomination.
In my opinion it's an Avatar-esque landmark film only way better. I hated Avatar story wise, but obviously Cameron's intent was revolutionary 3D. This was way better and the story is fine. Did I think it was predictable? Sure I guess. But I can say that for tons of classic story-driven movies.
All I can say is that's it's an astonishing feat of filmmaking and definitely worth seeing if you can appreciate that. I thought the characters were fine.I guess I should avoid it then, don't really care for 3d or the greatest visuals tbh, hated avatar. I thought the story or characters would have been good with all the praise being thrown around.
Definitely agree. Had high hopes for that movie. It just needed something more than what it had.Flight - 3/5. Denzel was awesome but it was missing something. Maybe more John Goodman.
I'm guessing people that say pennywise scares them saw it as children? I watched it recently and didn't see what all the fuss was about, granted Tim Curry's performance was good.Stephen King's It - 2.75/5 Nostalgia helps enough.
Yeah like I said, Rockwell and the scenes where he works are all pretty funny, but that's wrapped around the main character just getting shit on by assholes in every other scene.
I also watched it on a plane maybe it hit me differently. But again, I thought it was a good watch and would recommend people check it out.
When I watched it I had some slight memories of the last time I saw it back around when it came out. I could remember being scared from scenes that I now have to make myself feel a scary feeling in order to make the movie as best as possible. There are also some problems with the writing, especially near the end.I'm guessing people that say pennywise scares them saw it as children? I watched it recently and didn't see what all the fuss was about, granted Tim Curry's performance was good.
The rave reviews that I read all praised its character development and story, so I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at.If you are judging Gravity on character development and story, you aren't looking at it correctly.
Really? Well that's another story all together. If I were writing a review of it (and I wrote entertainment reviews for four years of my life) I would only talk about two things. The absolute marvel of a feat the movie is filmmaking wise, and Sandra Bullock's lock of an Oscar nom performance.The rave reviews that I read all praised its character development and story, so I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at.
Haha yeah, now we are in agreement.Really? Well that's another story all together. If I were writing a review of it (and I wrote entertainment reviews for four years of my life) I would only talk about two things. The absolute marvel of a feat the movie is filmmaking wise, and Sandra Bullock's lock of an Oscar nom performance.
The story can be summed up in one sentence and the characters give little backstory. That's odd to me those things were praised when they are virtually non-existent IMO.
I'm sorry to hear thatMy local theater is showing Doctor Who: Day of the Doctor in 3D at the end of the month.
Indeed. What a waste of a screen.I'm sorry to hear that
Well, it's only a one-time showing. Usually that slot is filled with a Digitally Restored Classic Film (such as Risky Business, Matrix, and Grease), a concert simulcast, or a special event like the live Rifftrax the same week.Indeed. What a waste of a screen.
Could have used that to give Thor another showing.
True, IM3 was awful.Probably not. It just wasn't a particularly good movie.
I mean it wasn't IM3 bad, but it still wasn't very good.