TimboSliceGB
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 1 (100%)
Can't remember last time I payed for ms office so many better opions that are free on internet that can even make the files work on office for others to view
You greatly overestimate the appeal of this. Anyone with proprietary or personal information will shy away from a new vector of attack. Tech companies won't use it, government won't use it, and health care won't use it.It's looking like MS is going to try to sell Office as a service to folks that need to use it on a lot of devices. They'll still have the regular software package but going forward the cloud is the way to go. People will be able to work on their stuff anywhere and on any device made by any manufacturer. I'm sure you can see the appeal of this?
They'veThat's weird that GBA virtual console games are coming to the WII U and not the 3DS. Would have prefer it on the 3DS than the WII U.
well said. nintendo's goofed big time on that.They'veed up the whole thing so that now the two systems are competitors instead of being great compliments to one another.
Well there is the Gamepad. What exactly was on the GBA that was so fantastic that it's a must buy. I did have a GBA Advanced (still do somewhere) but that was for Zelda on GC for the tingle stuff. I didn't really play games on it.They'veed up the whole thing so that now the two systems are competitors instead of being great compliments to one another.
Golden Sun series, Fire Emblem, Pokemon, Zelda, Castlevania, Metroid, Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, Advance Wars. Those games might not appeal to you but you can't really argue that they weren't good GBA games.Well there is the Gamepad. What exactly was on the GBA that was so fantastic that it's a must buy. I did have a GBA Advanced (still do somewhere) but that was for Zelda on GC for the tingle stuff. I didn't really play games on it.
I actually just bought Golden Sun and Advance Wars 2 in the past week (and really wanting to play Zero Mission and Fusion someday), playing catch up since I never owned a GBA in the past. For most people I know, they don't buy both the handheld and the consoles, just either or, so cross marketing the GBA games on a home console that has a portable (well, semi portable) screen isn't a bad idea at all.Golden Sun series, Fire Emblem, Pokemon, Zelda, Castlevania, Metroid, Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, Advance Wars. Those games might not appeal to you but you can't really argue that they weren't good GBA games.
The GBA had a ton of great games for it.
Fire Emblem, Advance Wars, WarioWare, Super Monkey Ball, Prince of Persia, Klonoa, F-Zero, Astro Boy, Boktai, and plenty more beyond that. Plus, it's probably the only way you'll get Yoshi's Island on any Virtual Console.Well there is the Gamepad. What exactly was on the GBA that was so fantastic that it's a must buy. I did have a GBA Advanced (still do somewhere) but that was for Zelda on GC for the tingle stuff. I didn't really play games on it.
Agreed. There were some fantastic GBA games (I still have my GBA SP and plenty of games for it, hated the dim original GBA but loved the backlit SP), but they're best played on a tiny screen. GBA games have a resolution of 240x160, which would look awful on a 1920x1080 TV (or even a 720p one). Can't imagine why Nintendo doesn't focus on GC games for the Wii U, and keep the handheld game ports to the 3DS.Fire Emblem, Advance Wars, WarioWare, Super Monkey Ball, Prince of Persia, Klonoa, F-Zero, Astro Boy, Boktai, and plenty more beyond that. Plus, it's probably the only way you'll get Yoshi's Island on any Virtual Console.
The thing is that these games were made for a portable, so it makes more sense for the 3DS since they already gave out the Ambassador games there. Blowing up the games for an HDTV or even the GamePad is not going to look that great.
SNES has a much bigger resolution than GBA, so of course they look pretty good on the Wii U.Eh, although they wouldn't look the greatest, a lot of GBA games look like or were based on SNES games which really hold up well in terms of console TV play.
I've been playing SNES virtual console games (Super Mario World, Super Metroid, Earthbound) on my TV and they look great. On the Gamepad they look even better, in fact I say they look better on the Gamepad than they would on a 3DS or 3DS XL.
I'm actually intrigued by GBA and DS games on the Wii U, although reasonable pricing is going to be a major factor on whether I actually pick up some titles.
I have gameboy advance player for my gamecube and games look fine on that.SNES has a much bigger resolution than GBA, so of course they look pretty good on the Wii U.
GBA games were designed with a smaller screen in mind, so they are a better fit on the 3DS as I've seen from playing them on mine myself. SNES games were designed for a bigger TV display, so they work well on a TV.
My point still stands that they'd be a better fit on the 3DS than the Wii U and Nintendo ignoring that is a mistake. They should be focusing on getting N64, GC, and Wii games on the Wii U Virtual Console and adding GBA and DS to the 3DS Virtual Console.I have gameboy advance player for my gamecube and games look fine on that.
Not really disagreeing with that but just saying that its not like they havent GBA games on TV before.My point still stands that they'd be a better fit on the 3DS than the Wii U and Nintendo ignoring that is a mistake. They should be focusing on getting N64, GC, and Wii games on the Wii U Virtual Console and adding GBA and DS to the 3DS Virtual Console.
GBA on an SDTV is probably a bit better than an HDTV, but a 3DS screen would still be the ideal situation.Not really disagreeing with that but just saying that its not like they havent GBA games on TV before.
This really shouldnt be a shock to anyone since they said a year ago they were going to add GBA games to the Wii U VC.
The exclusivity between the two gives off the impression of there being a Wii U eShop team making faces at the 3DS eShop team saying "We get these games and you can't have them!" *sticks tongue out at them* It's like they're grade school kids that can't share.Im following you but why is it "childish?"
Can't say I really agree with that at all but ok, lol.The exclusivity between the two gives off the impression of there being a Wii U eShop team making faces at the 3DS eShop team saying "We get these games and you can't have them!" *sticks tongue out at them*
I'm just being facetious with that part, so you don't need to take it that seriously.Can't say I really agree with that at all but ok, lol.
They're probably going to upscale it by a factor of 3 and have it take up the SD space in the center of your screen. 720X480.My point still stands that they'd be a better fit on the 3DS than the Wii U and Nintendo ignoring that is a mistake. They should be focusing on getting N64, GC, and Wii games on the Wii U Virtual Console and adding GBA and DS to the 3DS Virtual Console.
Nintendo doesn't seem particularly fond of that idea. I think that they believe that if they have to put work in to port it to another platform than you should have to pay for the content (and their hard work) on that platform. I mean, look at the Wii to Wii U games. They obviously don't give a shit if Sony is letting you buy a game once and play it on 2 (and in some cases 3) platforms, they don't think they're in competition with anyone else. Or at least that's what they've believed for quite some time (that belief may be changing finally).Of course the simplest solution is cross-buy/cross-play between Wii U and 3DS.
Who knows. A lot of people (myself included) have found the 32GB models for $250 or less. They might do a price cut at E3 though the previous price cut was a month or two after that.Do you think the Wii U will see another price drop at E3? My girlfriend is thinking about getting me one for my birthday in March with the Target GC deal next week, but I'm wondering if it's gonna drop further. Even when it comes to gifts, I am a CAG after all![]()
True but it would be nice just to purchase the really old games just once. The price for the virtual console game are pretty steep considering how old they are and some of them can even be found on compilation disc or other means for less what Nintendo is charging.Why does Nintendo need cross buy? 3ds should keep having its own games and wii u the same. Sony only did cross buy to help sell their handheld system. Nintendo don't need that with 3ds.
They want to sell their console that gets a lot of the same games as 3DS, so Virtual Console and eShop stuff would be more enticing for people to own both and be able to play them wherever they want to play them.Why does Nintendo need cross buy? 3ds should keep having its own games and wii u the same. Sony only did cross buy to help sell their handheld system. Nintendo don't need that with 3ds.
Agreed. It seems like a no-brainer. Lots of people have 3DS's. If those people got Wii U copies of the 3DS games they buy, they could eventually get a critical mass of Wii U games. Lots of people would be tempted to pick up a Wii U if they already own say, 10 games on it.They want to sell their console that gets a lot of the same games as 3DS, so Virtual Console and eShop stuff would be more enticing for people to own both and be able to play them wherever they want to play them.
Eh. Seeing how efficiently Sony has handled cross buy, both with new digital titles and PS1 games, one flat price is the way to go. These are games that just need an emulator working, something people on the internet have had working for years. No game development cost involved. Hell, the Vita had PS1 support patched in months after release, and suddenly a bunch of games people bought years prior on PSN were playable at no extra cost beyond what they already paid. This is about giving consumers a good value to repurchase old games that they could easily buy used or play on emulators, and so far Nintendo hasn't done that.They could easily make the games available on both systems at the same time, then offer a discount if you buy it both places.
e.g., Metroid Fusion is $5 on 3DS e-shop, $7 on Wii U e-shop, $9 for complete access on both.
I think you'd find that if you broke out several different Wii U topics into multiple threads you wouldn't get nearly the activity you'd want. People tend not to monitor several different threads at once (especially on just one slice of gaming). That's just my observation from 10 years on CAGBrad Bishop said:It sort of sucks that all Wii U discussion, no matter what the topic, is contained in this long thread.
Yeah, looks pretty good. Scores have mostly been really good but oddly Gamespot gave it 6/10. Need to read the review and see what their problem was.Seems like DKC Tropical Freeze is getting good reviews at the moment.
whoa so people hate gamespot now? i thought it was ign that was hated.Their problem is that they're GameSpot.
FixedTheir problem is that they're review scores don't live up to the expectation I have of the game.
There's a whole list over at TV Tropes with reviews of theirs that have caused controversy. They were actually the Trope Namer for 8.8.whoa so people hate gamespot now? i thought it was ign that was hated.
ah i see the true meaning to his post. lolFixed
yeah i dont get it. seems kinda dumb. Lordvila seems to have it right.There's a whole list over at TV Tropes with reviews of theirs that have caused controversy. They were actually the Trope Namer for 8.8.
It's mostly from Zelda fans going insane at the notion of Jeff Gerstmann suggesting that Twilight Princess wasn't a perfect game like they expected. Some of those people even cheered his firing due to the whole Gerstmann-gate thing.yeah i dont get it. seems kinda dumb. Lordvila seems to have it right.