Let's argue about Mike Brown!

Who do you think arrests officers? Non-officers?

(Removed block in edit)

Second thought, I'm done addressing you. You're illogical, ignore facts, and outright a hypocrite. You've pretty much admitted to be a criminal, and appear to be shifting responsibility. If you actually did proper research, you'd find exactly what you're looking for. I'm not google, and I'm not here to teach you anything.

And . . . we're done.
Police don't arrest police, bad police just get to "turn themselves in" or unless a different jurisdiction take over.

I post proof, evidence, links, news stories, what do you do, you come out with personal attack and the passive aggressive attitude... Typical M.O

And for the record there was never anything btw us, I was only posting facts and information to disprove your claims which is why I continually quoted you ( not as a response to you, but as a response against your claims that you want others to believe )

You are still proclaiming how "few" of the bad apples there are when its is utterly false

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Police don't arrest police, bad police just get to "turn themselves in" or unless a different jurisdiction take over.

I post proof, evidence, links, news stories, what do you do, you come out with personal attack and the passive aggressive attitude... Typical M.O

And for the record there was never anything btw us, I was only posting facts and information to disprove your claims which is why I continually quoted you ( not as a response to you, but as a response against your claims that you want others to believe )

You are still proclaiming how "few" of the bad apples there are when its is utterly false
Police don't arrest other police?

You're a moron.

 
Did someone here say that cops protect the innocents, arrest bad guys and keep us safe

Well seems like these cops had too much free time on their hands ....

http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/story/26680063/2014/10/01/speed-ticket-quotas-led-to-demise-of-waldo-police-department

Fact is crime is going down all across the board, murders are likely committed by someone the victim knows,  the only murders that are going up where the victim don't know the perpetrator are:  cop on people homicides

Crimes keep going down yet the police state keeps growing bigger

 
I say this as someone who actually does believe that latent racist attitudes, institutional racism, and the like are serious problems in our society. You're an idiot.
I'm willing to give this one a pass considering he even broaches some subjects and there are bigger idiots. He has a blog on CAG too...haha

Too bad it's basically in the same style of his posts.

I really can't tell if he's just a troll or some hipster asshole who thinks he "gets it".
N00b doesn't have the rep of mykevermin or me on this subject, but his drive-by posting and lack of actual engagement doesn't mean he's wrong.

It's not like you're going out of your way to criticize rebel or RPG.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow. I think this is the least condescending, sarcastic thing I've ever witnessed you post. If you posted like this more often, I'd have more respect for you and your opinion. So, let me say thanks. The intro part may of sounded dickish (because you haven't quite redeemed yourself from the snarky posts before), but respect.

Personally, I don't see it as minimizing the issue. I see it as pointing out his total hypocrisy in these situations. I don't care if someone calls someone a racist, as long as there's some proof to it. I like logic, and the assumption of innocence until guilt is proven. At least when it comes to logical debates, despite the fact that I'm trained to pull guilt out of people on the daily basis. Personally, I've witnessed him call others racist with no backing whatsoever, including officers that showed no indication of being racist. So, it may seem like minimizing, but to me, I'm calling his ass out for being exactly what he concludes others to be *without* the evidence to back it.

Racism is certainly still a problem. Especially in certain areas. However, when it comes to law enforcement, I don't see it as being "systemic" or nearly as widespread of a problem as many seem to make it out to be. Then again, I'm limited to my perspective by area and those that I know personally. Working in an area where I'm the minority, it's a much different playing field than say, Los Angeles. Here, the majority of officers match the race of the area.

From time to time, I do hear of an individual officer or an agency being found to be profiling by race. It's certainly not nearly as common as it was, say, 30 years ago. It certainly hasn't happened here in some time to my knowledge. Instead, I see rapid accusations without any basis to it. Which is why, in recent times, the feds keep stepping in but then nothing comes of it usually. That's not to say that in recent times there haven't been bad departments that were dealt with, but it's nowhere near the levels implied by people like Finger_Shocker.

Today, if I were to go out and rightfully arrest a criminal (say, a crack dealer selling to kids) with minimal force, a crowd gathers and immediately starts recording and yelling out things like "excessive force!" and "unlawful arrest!". All because of a difference in race. Which is precisely why I address Finger_Shocker and not Rebelschs. Rebelschs doesn't claim to be not racist, or even accuse others of racism. He doesn't even seemingly try to put up a real argument. He just says "Yeehaw! The south will rise again!". Addressing his points is the equivalent to trying to have a coherent conversation with someone high on bath salts. It's pointless to me because I rarely run across someone who says those sort of things seriously.

Then again, the more I deal with Finger_Shocker, the more I realize he's just as bad. He's getting more and more obvious with his postings that he's just a troll since he refuses to answer questions or address points brought up.

The long short (or tldr;) is: Yes, racism exists. I think it's more an issue that is rooted in individual officers, and it hits some agencies because of the brass initiating it, which makes it remote. I just don't see it as something that should be pointed to immediately without proof. By doing that and throwing wild accusations, it polarizes the community and forces a more "us vs them" mindset. Which isn't to say that it wasn't something widespread in the past, but I believe we've pushed through the majority of it.

That's not to say that it can't rear it's ugly head again. I mean, with officers of all kinds being driven away from the job, things aren't exactly looking good.

What does Finger_Shocker's arrest history matter? Well, for me, it's just another proof of where his bias and hypocrisy comes from. Since he likes to instigate with BS, I figure throwing it right back in his face is fair game. ;)

And again, thanks for the calm-ish post. I'd love to engage you more in posts like this, as I do enjoy the constructive criticism and opposing viewpoint. I promise I'll play nice with you, if you do the same with me. ;)
That's because you haven't been in Vs. very long. When you deal with racist conservative trolls for as long as I have, you tend to give a lot less of a shit, not to mention that I have a lot less time than before. You caught me on a good day maybe?

Things are certainly better than they were 30 years ago, but that's not really setting a high standard to overcome and a lot of the same sentiment is just covered up with a veneer of politeness or political correctness(irony!) because it simply isn't socially acceptable to be openly racist in some of the same ways anymore. Coy attempts at making the argument about "culture" instead of race is a change only in language.

Lee Atwater said:
Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry S. Dent, Sr. and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [the new Southern Strategy of Ronald Reagan] doesn't have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he's campaigned on since 1964 and that's fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster.

Questioner: But the fact is, isn't it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stamps?

Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger."
Maybe things are different in your department or maybe they're not, but feds are pretty impotent to begin with outside of Consent Decrees and even then, it can take a decade before any progress is made. A black cop doing what racist white cops do/did in LA has the same effect. You mention that it comes from the brass and it's just a few departments that are dealt with, but the police can't do it alone. It requires the collusion of the DA's, judges, politicians, and ultimately the people that vote. If it was just a few bad departments, local lawyers and judges would be shutting that kind of behavior down, but that just isn't the case. That's how it's a systemic problem and not a problem of a few individuals.

There's a shit ton of history that goes into accusations of racism when it comes to institutions like the police and THAT is what polarizes a community; not the mere accusation of it. Protests/riots like in Ferguson and all over the country don't happen in a vacuum.

I'll just drop this here because he said it far better than I can:

MLK said:
Now I wanted to say something about the fact that we have lived over these last two or three summers with agony and we have seen our cities going up in flames. And I would be the first to say that I am still committed to militant, powerful, massive, non­-violence as the most potent weapon in grappling with the problem from a direct action point of view. I'm absolutely convinced that a riot merely intensifies the fears of the white community while relieving the guilt. And I feel that we must always work with an effective, powerful weapon and method that brings about tangible results. But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the plight of the negro poor has worsened over the last twelve or fifteen years. It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity.
http://www.gphistorical.org/mlk/mlkspeech/

Btw, I'm not a huge fan of MLK and for all of his non-violent efforts, he was still shot in the face. If that never happened, he'd be derided as a communist race-baiting opportunist like Sharpton and Jackson. Proof? That's what they were saying about him when he was alive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
N00b doesn't have the rep of mykevermin or me on this subject, but his drive-by posting and lack of actual engagement doesn't mean he's wrong.

It's not like you're going out of your way to criticize rebel or RPG.
Yeah, but who walks into a room (thread) and presents their argument by immediately acting like a pretentious douche? I don't go out of my way to criticize rebel because he makes himself look stupid with his civil war "South will rise" nonsense. Nobody takes him seriously anyway.

 
As for what you just posted, Dohdough...I think some of it is seeing what you want to see. Do conservatives really want to cut taxes, food stamps, wellfare, etc. BECAUSE it'll hurt black people. Or are they just greedy as fuck and want every last penny for themselves? Do you really believe that if a white person were on government services that rich white conservatives would all of a sudden be sympathetic and not mind pitching in to help them "get back on their feet". I don't buy it.

Yes, it may affect more black people than white people just by nature of economic circumstances...but that's a byproduct. It's not THE REASON they do it. Now, why do poor ass, uneducated white people vote Republican when it often directly goes against their personal interests? One of life's mysteries.

Maybe some of that can be attributed to racist ideals. But I think bigger than that even is religion. Republicans have this uncanny way of finding issues where if you don't agree with them on it, you're "going against God". Abortion, gay marriage, etc. So, you end up with people who might benefit from some Democratic programs and policies who actually vote against them because they "don't want to go to hell."

Sure, some of those people are also racist. But other than the few who openly state they'd never vote for a black person, I really don't think voting lines are drawn on racial bias. Tim Scott is a good example of this. As long at you're putting more green in their pockets, it doesn't matter what color your skin is.

 
Down in South Florida we have a boat parade every winter. Boats decorated in Christmas lights, it's something for old rich white people. Anyways It's become a big event in recent years. Well some protesters came out to block the event by laying on a drawbridge to stop the parade. But typical South Florida people don't know when to show up on time. The boats had already passed the drawbridge. So instead they blocked a busy intersection for an hour. Police came out arrested a couple protesters, end of story.

The whole thing was fucking stupid and accomplished nothing other than annoying motorists.

If you're going to make a protest at least give 2 shits about the case to show up on time. These idiots halfassed it and where only out there to be self-righteous and show off their scary V for Vendetta masks.

 
Down in South Florida we have a boat parade every winter. Boats decorated in Christmas lights, it's something for old rich white people. Anyways It's become a big event in recent years. Well some protesters came out to block the event by laying on a drawbridge to stop the parade. But typical South Florida people don't know when to show up on time. The boats had already passed the drawbridge. So instead they blocked a busy intersection for an hour. Police came out arrested a couple protesters, end of story.

The whole thing was fucking stupid and accomplished nothing other than annoying motorists.

If you're going to make a protest at least give 2 shits about the case to show up on time. These idiots halfassed it and where only out there to be self-righteous and show off their scary V for Vendetta masks.
Well, they set out to cause a non-violent disturbance as an act of civil disobedience to draw attention to the issue. I'm guessing most people knew about why they did it? So it looks like they accomplished their goal since you're in this thread posting about it whether you support their cause or not.
 
Well, they set out to cause a non-violent disturbance as an act of civil disobedience to draw attention to the issue. I'm guessing most people knew about why they did it? So it looks like they accomplished their goal since you're in this thread posting about it whether you support their cause or not.
Don't get me wrong I'm totally for protesting in peace. For personal reasons I really hate that boat parade so I would've been trilled if they stopped the drawbridges. I was sitting at work cheering for it. That's why I came across as a little miffed because they weren't organized and didn't accomplish their goal. It just became a somewhat mediocre protest when it could've been something on a national level. But like I said that's Miami, we half-ass everything.

 
Yeah, but who walks into a room (thread) and presents their argument by immediately acting like a pretentious douche? I don't go out of my way to criticize rebel because he makes himself look stupid with his civil war "South will rise" nonsense. Nobody takes him seriously anyway.
So nobody takes rebel seriously, yet how many people reacted to the new guy/gal after a couple drive-by posts? I'm pretty sure that you don't like what s)he has to say and you don't take him/her seriously either. If you looked into his 23 posts, (s)he's been drive-by posting on several threads with the same type of stuff. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if (s)he gets banned soon.

I find it really interesting who responds to these types of posters and how they react to them.

As for what you just posted, Dohdough...I think some of it is seeing what you want to see. Do conservatives really want to cut taxes, food stamps, wellfare, etc. BECAUSE it'll hurt black people. Or are they just greedy as fuck and want every last penny for themselves? Do you really believe that if a white person were on government services that rich white conservatives would all of a sudden be sympathetic and not mind pitching in to help them "get back on their feet". I don't buy it.

Yes, it may affect more black people than white people just by nature of economic circumstances...but that's a byproduct. It's not THE REASON they do it. Now, why do poor ass, uneducated white people vote Republican when it often directly goes against their personal interests? One of life's mysteries.
So if it effects are racist by outcome, regardless of intent, what would you call it then? "Nature?" Wouldn't that imply that racist outcomes is the default state of that law and therefore racist?

Maybe some of that can be attributed to racist ideals. But I think bigger than that even is religion. Republicans have this uncanny way of finding issues where if you don't agree with them on it, you're "going against God". Abortion, gay marriage, etc. So, you end up with people who might benefit from some Democratic programs and policies who actually vote against them because they "don't want to go to hell."
Pretty sure Lee Atwater's quote covers this as well as a lot of work he did to cement the relationship between the christian dominionists and republicans. There were always religious firebrands in the political arena, but the game has changed in the last 30 years because of the types of media we have now. There's a reason why the welfare queen morphed from some random white person fraudulently collecting multiple checks while driving a new caddie living in some nice town on the dole to some poor black woman that has multiple kids living in the projects...and this was when whites were still the largest beneficiaries of welfare. We all know what a modern welfare queen is "supposed" to look like and what race they are so feeding into that imagery and racist sentiment isn't a large leap. "The welfare I get is ok, but those lazy fuckers need to get off their (black)asses."

Sure, some of those people are also racist. But other than the few who openly state they'd never vote for a black person, I really don't think voting lines are drawn on racial bias. Tim Scott is a good example of this. As long at you're putting more green in their pockets, it doesn't matter what color your skin is.
There are always going to be some "good ones." Like RvB said, racism isn't a binary where you're racist or not racist, but there are levels of racism. That said, there's a reason why black conservatives are rare just like how there are very few Latino conservatives.
 
Don't get me wrong I'm totally for protesting in peace. For personal reasons I really hate that boat parade so I would've been trilled if they stopped the drawbridges. I was sitting at work cheering for it. That's why I came across as a little miffed because they weren't organized and didn't accomplish their goal. It just became a somewhat mediocre protest when it could've been something on a national level. But like I said that's Miami, we half-ass everything.
Ahh...gotcha.

Miami doesn't half ass everything though. The Boss said she had the best sangria EVER when she was down there and she generally doesn't like booze.
 
They are NOT voting against themselves, they are voting against those people. Do yourself a favor and read conservatives talking points. They never refer to themselves its always those people.
They use key words that resonate racism but yet can also say they aren't racist since those words aren't obvious.

Poor racist whites aren't voting against themselves, they are voting against those people that is not them.
 
About the rebels vs the new guy thing. I love how a poe's law liberal saus things that are common sense all over the world like universal health care is good and the conservative calls every liberal terrorist subhumans.
 
Why did the new guy get banned?

Getting back on topic, so forensic evidence and multiple black eyewitnesses corroborate  Wilson's story. Seems like justice was served in this case.

 
Who is the new guy? I'm confused.

EDIT:  Nevermind.  I figured it out.  I'm betting it has to do with Gamergate, since he seemed to of been going full SJW about that too in another section of the forums?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ahh...gotcha.

Miami doesn't half ass everything though. The Boss said she had the best sangria EVER when she was down there and she generally doesn't like booze.
Who's the Boss?

main.jpg


No seriously. Who's your boss..... I want to know where I can get that sangria.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why did the new guy get banned?
He was posting crap like this in Off Topic

Gamers are the worst.

Nobody cares, GamerGater. Please, stop assaulting me with a newspaper...?

Games are not as sexist as people think?! Oh, my gosh!

"Gosh." - me, in regards to all of 2014, and all of the garbage/vitriol/harassment I have received, and that has happened.
Like I said...pretentious douche.

 
Why did the new guy get banned?

Who is the new guy? I'm confused.

EDIT: Nevermind. I figured it out. I'm betting it has to do with Gamergate, since he seemed to of been going full SJW about that too in another section of the forums?
As long as you keep your douche baggery to the useless cesspool of opinions known as Vs., mods don't really give a fuck anymore. Or to put it more accurately, the one mod that gave a fuck or two and had a lap boy, is no longer a mod.

In other words, CAG 3.0 sucks.

N00b had a point and people have said worse with no modding so...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why did the new guy get banned?

Getting back on topic, so forensic evidence and multiple black eyewitnesses corroborate Wilson's story. Seems like justice was served in this case.
Justice was served, but a way to charge a white cop with being racist was not, so they decided to expand Black Friday to Kill White People Monday, and instead of 50% off sales, they made it 100% off as long as you set the store on fire.

All I'm saying is that they set Little Caesar's Pizza on fire....Yeah, Little Caesar's is really holding the black man down.

 
Its raining BAD APPLES everywhere.........

Where is Feria when you need him to tell everyone that its only isolated cases and its just one bad apples

Present day news:

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/nypd-plainclothes-officer-hits-youth-cuffed-article-1.2050762

12 year old kid gets repeatedly punched

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/georgia-deputys-girlfriend-shot-to-death-in-bed-during-make-up-sex-after-night-of-fighting-and-drinking/

Cop claim girlfriend shot herself while they were having sex

And in case this is what you get when you let police to police themselves.  Fellow Internal Review Officer busted and convicted for aiding officers under investigation.  So someone who was in charge of investigating bad cops was aiding bad cops...  Again please remind me of where cops would arrest bad cops again

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ex-nypd-community-service-tix-fix-case-article-1.2050210

 
[quote name="Finger_Shocker" post="12342171" timestamp="1418989765"]Its raining BAD APPLES everywhere.........

Where is Feria when you need him to tell everyone that its only isolated cases and its just one bad apples

Present day news:
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/nypd-plainclothes-officer-hits-youth-cuffed-article-1.2050762
12 year old kid gets repeatedly punched

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/georgia-deputys-girlfriend-shot-to-death-in-bed-during-make-up-sex-after-night-of-fighting-and-drinking/
Cop claim girlfriend shot herself while they were having sex


And in case this is what you get when you let police to police themselves. Fellow Internal Review Officer busted and convicted for aiding officers under investigation. So someone who was in charge of investigating bad cops was aiding bad cops... Again please remind me of where cops would arrest bad cops again
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ex-nypd-community-service-tix-fix-case-article-1.2050210[/quote]
Oh okay. You convinced me. I must be corrupt. In fact, all cops must be. I guess we should all leave the policing to you alone. Enjoy it!
 
It's almost like Finger Shocker is just now figuring out that society is generally shitty. If you wanted to target a search toward "bad teachers", "bad priests", "bad politicians", "bad businessmen", and *gasp* even "bad soldiers". you could find basically the same articles. And you could also find articles about "the good ones" and ways that they contribute to their community. It's just the world, dude. Every profession is going to have its sick and depraved members.

 
Is that NYPD picture real? I can't be. Obviously support for the NYPD but that's probably the least effective way to do it.

 
That's a different case. And I think that was more in retaliation to the Crips being arrested in East New York, considering the suspect is allegedly a Baltimore Gang member. His internet posts were all about cop killing, and with such a big trail like that, it makes me wonder if the NSA is actually trying to capture domestic terrorists or are they wasting a ton of taxpayer money on only one group of brown people.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Strange. Different case, yet this guy made posts directly relating to Mike Brown and Eric Garner just before his death. Saying he was going to do just what he did as retaliation.

But it's a gang thing. Yeah . . .
 
I saw the names of the cops during the Commissioner's press conference. I'm just very sad that this happened, especially when it was just so senseless. My heart goes out to the officers' families.

And meanwhile, trolls on the internet blame the Mayor and Commissioner for something an asshole wanted in at least two other states did with extremely clear intentions. It's... terrible that they talk about how everybody should respect the police as if they hold the iron fist, and with the same breath bring disrespect to to the men and women who also keep this or any other city operating as it should.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Was he a protestor? No not by a long shot, so you going to blame all the protestors when this guy wasn't even involved in any of the protesting.

Moron....
Was his action, horrific as it was in protest of a cause? Yes it was, he quite publicly broadcasted his intent online that this is in response to Garner and Ferguson. Is it wrong to paint everyone with the same broad brush? Yes it is, just as it is wrong to vilify all police for the actions of a few, and even when the original event that triggered this whole mess was completely justified.

That being said, just days before, NYC protestors chanted "What do we want? More dead cops." Just a couple days ago, two police lieutenants are assaulted while trying to make an arrest of a violent protestor with one sustaining a broken nose. Now we have two officers essentially assassinated. This is escalating and it is not the police doing the escalation. Violence just begets more violence and the protesters have to assume some responsibility for what is happening.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait, Finger Shocker told us all the police were the bad guys.....you mean a Liberal was WRONG?

They need to let the police ride around in the backs of pickup trucks with machine guns in urban areas. That would help some of this problem. Give them permission to run over or shoot whatever they need.

 
Wait, Finger Shocker told us all the police were the bad guys.....you mean a Liberal was WRONG?

They need to let the police ride around in the backs of pickup trucks with machine guns in urban areas. That would help some of this problem. Give them permission to run over or shoot whatever they need.
That sounds like a totally reasonable suggestion and something that could actually happen. How come you're not in charge?

 
Was his action, horrific as it was in protest of a cause? Yes it was, he quite publicly broadcasted his intent online that this is in response to Garner and Ferguson. Is it wrong to paint everyone with the same broad brush? Yes it is, just as it is wrong to vilify all police for the actions of a few, and even when the original event that triggered this whole mess was completely justified.

That being said, just days before, NYC protestors chanted "What do we want? More dead cops." Just a couple days ago, two police lieutenants are assaulted while trying to make an arrest of a violent protestor with one sustaining a broken nose. Now we have two officers essentially assassinated. This is escalating and it is not the police doing the escalation. Violence just begets more violence and the protesters have to assume some responsibility for what is happening.
Im wondering who started this first, pretty sure people didn't wake up and wanted to protest against something.

Again if police do not get rid of their own bad apples, all police are to blame. They represent a institution, if you have corrupt people in your institution that you do not get rid off, you are part of the problem.

Again what have AMERICA and LOCAL GOV'T done with bad police, there is basically a bad cop everyday these day around the country. People are reacting to the truth now because cameras are everywhere.

Before police lie, people died, people are falsely imprisoned, falsely charged, and sometimes robbed, now we are seeing what was complaint about in the past but it was his vs. his words. And police lied and got away with just merely due to their badge

ARE YOU AS OUTRAGED AT BAD COPS THEN AT PROTESTORS WHO STANDING UP AGAINST CORRUPTION

 
Im wondering who started this first, pretty sure people didn't wake up and wanted to protest against something.

Again if police do not get rid of their own bad apples, all police are to blame. They represent a institution, if you have corrupt people in your institution that you do not get rid off, you are part of the problem.

Again what have AMERICA and LOCAL GOV'T done with bad police, there is basically a bad cop everyday these day around the country. People are reacting to the truth now because cameras are everywhere.

Before police lie, people died, people are falsely imprisoned, falsely charged, and sometimes robbed, now we are seeing what was complaint about in the past but it was his vs. his words. And police lied and got away with just merely due to their badge

ARE YOU AS OUTRAGED AT BAD COPS THEN AT PROTESTORS WHO STANDING UP AGAINST CORRUPTION
Wow, so you're blaming the victims now, is that what I'm reading? And then you're insinuating that these protesters, who have attacked and KILLED INNOCENT POLICE OFFICERS, are just standing up to corruption now?

You're a large part of the problem with this world, and people like you. Criminals who can't take responsibility for their own actions, and then blame the victims and those who hold you accountable for your actions.

See something, say something? Nope. Stop snitchin' is instead pushed as the social prerogative. Friend / family member gets arrested? Damn those police! I don't care that they killed someone, or just robbed someone, or raped someone, they're innocent! Damn the evidence and witnesses!

The same day that 2 officers are AMBUSHED in their squad cars, chants for dead cops were going on in New York. It happens, and instead of outcries from protesters, they continue to protest the "injustices". Had it been the KKK or some other radical group chanting for the deaths of some group of people, it'd be looked over and condemned. This time, however, the protests are credible?

You want injustices fixed? How about you hold those in your own neighborhoods and families accountable for their actions? How about you take responsibility for your own actions? You've made outright racist, hypocritical comments and essentially admitted that you're a criminal. Instead of taking responsibility, apologizing, and taking your lumps, you've decided to shift the blame.

You're the problem.

Within the past 24 or so hours, 2 NYPD officers were killed in an ambush slaying. 1 NYPD officer had a gun to his head and the trigger pulled, but thankfully it malfunctioned. 1 Tarpon Springs, FL Officer was killed in the line of duty, and another Missouri officer was shot several times while off-duty and remains in critical condition. All of these actions were done by CRIMINALS WITH ILL INTENT. Yet you want to criticize officers who's jobs are to hunt these evil doers? And you're going to critique the integrity of officers, while you couldn't pass a basic background check yourself?

"Oh, there's a bad cop every day!". There's over 780,000 sworn LEOs. If there were FIVE a day, that'd still make 0.2% of the LEOs a problem in a given year. Yet, somehow, they're the sole issue. In comparison to the big picture, that's a drop in the pan and below the general populations VIOLENT crime rate.

Yeah buddy, making tons of sense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why all the hate for people protesting crooked cops and a system that is failing in so many places?  Its just like the military hero worship, makes absolutely no sense to me.

 
And, with a little less vitriol:

http://mic.com/articles/106392/congress-just-passed-a-bill-addressing-police-killings-while-no-one-was-looking

Too bad that even when a shooting is justifiable, we'll still have the critics that think they know better than the experts.
Since when is reporting all deaths that are caused police a bad thing or related to experts of any kind? If you're so confident that you're right about there not being a trend that skews towards people of color, then you should have no problem with this legislation because you'll be proved right and shut people up like F_S and me.

I'm really curious about how you feel about the Cliven Bundy thing considering there were a shitload of people open carrying and being openly hostile to local cops and feds. I'm also curious about how you feel about those comments by that NYPD union rep and cops turning their backs on De Blasio at that press conference.

If we're going to give a certain segment of our population special privileges like the option to legally kill someone, why is it such an issue to hold them to a much higher standard than the general populace?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bread's done
Back
Top