Groupees: [NEW] Build a Greenlight Bundle 33 + Oktoberfest + MiniBundle 7

speedwerd

speedwerd

CAGiversary!
Zr5VdiP.png


Build A Greenlight Bundle 33

Buy it here: https://groupees.com/bagb33

Must spend at least $1/pick 2 games

Gamelist:


Oktoberfest Bundle

Buy it here: https://groupees.com/oktoberfest

For the minimum of $2, you get the following:

Mini Bundle 7

Buy it here: https://groupees.com/mini7

For a minimum of $2, you get the following:


Other Non-Gaming Bundles:


Icon Guide

CEVpe.gif
= Steam Key
2rCyT.png
= Steam Greenlight
yQk4P.png
= Desura Key
hp6ilsh.png
= GoG Code (Click To Redeem/Enter Code)

G5fwiDZ.png
= GamersGate Serial Key
iaNkw.png
= DRM Free Download

UdmOgyY.png
= Steam Trading Cards Available
kiGzp.png
= Playable On PC
e7cjl.gif
= Playable on MAC
uWi0M.gif
= Playable on Linux

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0 Downvote
If the games get greenlit, yes.  Outside of a few instances where there have been misunderstandings, but they typically work out.

 
They are good at giving keys for greenlit games, the only caveat being that almost all of them are complete shit.

 
So, I googled the POOpeas because I wondered who would name a food thing that... turns out it's basically small bags of pea sized bits of manure.

But I saw this on their page, spoilers cause stupid off topic.

"How many of you have experienced harassment from local authorities or HOA’s for trying to grow a garden on your own property? Since when do these types of organizations have the right to tell you how to feed your families"

Since you signed the HOA agreement or moved into city limits...

 
Reminds me of the people that bitch and bitch about not being able to have rain barrels (this state has very strict water laws due to how many other states get water from us so you werent allowed to collect it), and then they finally pass a law saying they are allowed to have a couple. Of course they dont actually use a rain barrel now but................damn gubment

 
ezelkow1 said:
Reminds me of the people that bitch and bitch about not being able to have rain barrels (this state has very strict water laws due to how many other states get water from us so you werent allowed to collect it), and then they finally pass a law saying they are allowed to have a couple. Of course they dont actually use a rain barrel now but................damn gubment
Click to expand...
Wait, what weird-ass state do you live in where cisterns are illegal? I mean, they're complete garbage as a source of drinking water, but I can't see any reason why people couldn't have them for nonpotable uses.

 
warreni said:
Wait, what weird-ass state do you live in where cisterns are illegal? I mean, they're complete garbage as a source of drinking water, but I can't see any reason why people couldn't have them for nonpotable uses.
Click to expand...
I'm assuming he's talking about Colorado since we just legalized it here...and yes, weed was legalized before being able to catch rain water.

 
Malkan said:
I'm assuming he's talking about Colorado since we just legalized it here...and yes, weed was legalized before being able to catch rain water.
Click to expand...
Anheuser-Busch needs to protect it's water sources, otherwise it can't achieve that perfect urine to spring water ratio that makes their beer so American.

 
Malkan said:
I'm assuming he's talking about Colorado since we just legalized it here...and yes, weed was legalized before being able to catch rain water.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I guess I'm dense, but I'm still trying to wrap my head around this: the issue of concern was that people would store such vast amounts of rainwater in barrels that it would dramatically impact the groundwater recharge rates? Is Colorado just a really densely-populated rural area? If not, I don't see how this makes any kind of sense. Is the rainwater so pure and smooth there that they figure people will start their own backyard water-bottling operations and there is no existing regulatory structure other than the cistern ban that would keep that from happening? I'm just at a loss to understand the thought process here.



IAmTheCheapestFox said:
Socialist hippie.
Click to expand...
You know it, fool!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
warreni said:
Yeah, I guess I'm dense, but I'm still trying to wrap my head around this: the issue of concern was that people would store such vast amounts of rainwater in barrels that it would dramatically impact the groundwater recharge rates? Is Colorado just a really densely-populated rural area? If not, I don't see how this makes any kind of sense. Is the rainwater so pure and smooth there that they figure people will start their own backyard water-bottling operations and there is no existing regulatory structure other than the cistern ban that would keep that from happening? I'm just at a loss to understand the thought process here.




You know it, fool!
Click to expand...
It seems it's a vestige of an outdated concept of how rainwater works. The law was essentially trying to protect the water supply and water sources from not being replenished due to greedy people collecting all the rainwater in buckets. But looks like the amount of rainwater that actually flows back into those water sources is so small that cisterns aren't likely to make a difference.

http://www.ncsl.org/research/environment-and-natural-resources/rainwater-harvesting.aspx

 
It's ironic that the person named rainking187 is the only one on-topic.

 
Last edited:
IAmTheCheapestFox said:
It seems it's a vestige of an outdated concept of how rainwater works. The law was essentially trying to protect the water supply and water sources from not being replenished due to greedy people collecting all the rainwater in buckets. But looks like the amount of rainwater that actually flows back into those water sources is so small that cisterns aren't likely to make a difference.


http://www.ncsl.org/research/environment-and-natural-resources/rainwater-harvesting.aspx
Click to expand...
Huh. That's a good read. It's still a bit cryptic in terms of what a "senior priority water user" is and I still find it odd that legalizing cisterns still means that people who collect water in cisterns don't have a "right" to the water? I guess I'd need to live out West or be an attorney to understand this concept of "water rights."

I find it disturbing that Texas allows people to connect rainwater-catchment systems to public water supplies. There's no way that could ever cause a problem. . . .



Blade said:
Meanwhile, rainking187 is the only one on-topic.
Click to expand...
What is this "on-topic" you speak of?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
spoderman said:
I come to this thread to read about how Poopees shit the bed, not rainwater!
Click to expand...
Well they are related... Rain water is a major component of the clear creek river which runs by the Coors brewery in Golden. I often go to clear creek to go rock climbing, and when I do this I add the other important ingredient by pissing in the river. This river filled with fresh mountain rain water and piss ends up in the Coors beers. It's this type of beer that Jonny used to entice Motoki with and after which we've never heard from him again. Without Motoki's critical evaluation of groupees bundles, they haven't had as much of an incentive to make any improvements to their bundles. Thus this leads to the increased downfall of groupees bundles we've seen lately.

 
Rain water is indeed more interesting than poopees.  In before the next bundle features rain water or a donation to rain water or risk of rain... no wait that game is way too good to ever show up in a poopees bundle nowadays. 

 
Glad I skipped the remute bundle, it's terrible. Only one of the steam games looks remotely interesting (Highway to the Moon), and Void is published by OtakuMaker, so it'll be bundled again. The greenlight/drm-free shit looks like trash to me
 
I kinda want one of the games, someone sell me your pre-order.

edit: aquired via mguiddy, ty!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You want my itch.io keys?

EDIT: or wait, I can just gift the whole package from groupees now I think.  Same difference though, since neither offer DRM-free and don't promise a key if it shows up on greenlight.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
volt1up said:
is hrk "legit"
Click to expand...
HRK is G2A, but I'm not worried much about it at 23 cents a game. I'm just pointing out that the bundle is pretty shitty because the cheaper bundle with more options (almost 100 games to choose from) has been around for weeks. This Alawar shouldn't even have $4 and $5 tiers...

 
Last edited:
Blade said:
HRK is G2A, but I'm not worried much about it at 23 cents a game. I'm just pointing out that the bundle is pretty shitty because the cheaper bundle with more options (almost 100 games to choose from) has been around for weeks. This Alawar shouldn't even have $4 and $5 tiers...
Click to expand...
Well, yeah. Motoki can pick out good granny games, but he doesn't necessarily have the influence to get the pricing we CAGs demand.

Give him time. It's only the first bundle he's put out since Groupees kidnapped him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Blade said:
Sorry Poopees, I bought the Alawar games I was missing (including your $5 tier dafuq u thinkin jonny) in a 15 game bundle from HRK for $3.50.

https://www.hrkgame.com/randomkeyshop/make-bundle/
Click to expand...
I somehow found 15 games I didn't already have on Steam to make a bundle with. They charged me a 50 cent fee for using Paypal which I found kinda weird. Is that standard practise or did I just forget to uncheck the box for the G2A payment protection scam?

 
BellardB said:
I somehow found 15 games I didn't already have on Steam to make a bundle with. They charged me a 50 cent fee for using Paypal which I found kinda weird. Is that standard practise or did I just forget to uncheck the box for the G2A payment protection scam?
Click to expand...
I was charged $3.10 + $0.39 fee for using Paypal instead of G2A funds. If they charged you on top of that, then you forgot to uncheck a box. All of these small fees are dumb scams they pull.

 
Probably wishful thinking on my part, but did anyone buy the current 50 bundle that doesn't want the music?  I can't really sell myself on grabbing it for zero games.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top