[quote name='neocisco']I like Thickie James.[/QUOTE]
1)

Yeah, well, she doesn't look like a junkie, so she's on the WWE shitlist.
2) Who the flyin'
fuuuuuuck is Slam Master J?
3) ROH is about the only decent alternative pro wrestling product out there. PWG is a close second. The rest are just full of tiny flippy guys who, to be quite honest, don't know how to wrestle at all.
Am I saying I could do better than them? No. I couldn't. I'm not trained. But I understand the old "story" metaphor for a wrestling match, and I know that I'm simply not entertained by matches who are constructed on the premise of spot/setup/spot/setup/spot/setup. I can't say enough how much I hate all that flippy shit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-NQcjcdxVA
Go to 1:25. There's NO

ING IMPACT to Red's two finishers. They're all flash and nothing to sink your teeth into. Let's compare that to easy-to-hate-internet-workrate darling, Kevin Nash.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1vIYDni3nU
That looks like something that can harm a mother

er. Amazing Red's finisher, that won him a title, looked as painful as a fly swatter. That's the problem with all this "alternative" wrestling. They sell wrestling matches to people who think that quasi "independent" means a promotion is good enough to follow, and then fills it with guys whose only concept of conveying an exciting match to fans is to give them enough spots to garner applause.
Independent wrestling fans strike me in the same way as those kids what listen to Fat Wreck Chords or Epitaph, as if that's self-satisfyingly "sticking it to the man." (hey, there are some good albums on that label, but let's be honest: they ain't punk rock in the ideological sense, and they ain't underground anymore than Britney Spears is.) Being an underdog company is not, to me, a self-evident thing that says "hey, this program is worth it."
Find me the last wrestling promotion that has had a good 30-40 minute long 2 out of 3 falls match of nothin' but chain wrestling. I'll follow those mother

ers. Who are the kids today who are studying Steamboat vs Flair, Sting vs Flair, Malenko vs Guerrero (ECW), Hart vs Michaels, Austin vs Hart (Bret or Owen), Undertaker vs. Angle? Why does it seem to me that wrestlers today only understand that they do one move here, walk to another place, do another move here, walk to yet another place, and do another move here? Who uses the vertical suplex anymore? A backbreaker? Jockeying for advantage via a collar and elbow tieup?
Where the

did wrestling go, and why are you people telling me to cheer for glorified gymnastics?
I can't be that jaded. Well, I clearly can be, but I can't be alone in that regard, right?