CocheseUGA
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 33 (100%)
[quote name='gregthomas77']No.
http://www.unmarried.org/newsletters/McDonough.php
The important part:
"Despite the expansion of protected statuses under the FFHA's 1988 updates, there is currently no federal protection against housing discrimination based on marital status. While many states have added such protections to their human rights and/or housing codes, thousands of municipalities nationwide presently have total discretion regarding housing discrimination based on marital status."
[/QUOTE]
That's not the important part of that article. The ACLU got involved and the jurisdiction acquiesed. It doesn't matter if you were actually discriminated, just the appearance will do sometimes.
http://www.unmarried.org/newsletters/McDonough.php
The important part:
"Despite the expansion of protected statuses under the FFHA's 1988 updates, there is currently no federal protection against housing discrimination based on marital status. While many states have added such protections to their human rights and/or housing codes, thousands of municipalities nationwide presently have total discretion regarding housing discrimination based on marital status."
[/QUOTE]
That's not the important part of that article. The ACLU got involved and the jurisdiction acquiesed. It doesn't matter if you were actually discriminated, just the appearance will do sometimes.