ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='Jodou']You know deals are slow when we can create a 100 page thread of nerd rage in two days lol.[/QUOTE]

I almost missed the news about free games at best buy!
 
This is bizarre. I contacted them via email yesterday asking them what I need to do to cancel and they told me to send a letter. I check my account today and see the following on my profile...

Date Expired 12/2/2009

Expiring roles


ECA Full Membership
This role will expire on 09/12/2010 - 01:38

None of that was there before today.
 
[quote name='blissskr']No offense taking. Being high as a kite off roxicet all day having just had eye surgery, thus having only a single eye at the moment. I feel it turned out ok when I put it together but looking at it now I do see some silly errors. I thought I ran it through spell check but its apparent that happened only in my mind lol.[/QUOTE]

Hey man. Wow, it took me almost a full day to wade through this thread and find your response, lol. I completely understand where you're coming from, and just wanted to apologize if I sounded snippy in any way. Just knowing how some of these corporations think, I didn't want any of the actual message to roll right off their backs. But regardless of any grammar errors, you're still on the front lines for the cause. And that's certainly commendable. Hope you feel better, and take care of that eye!

[quote name='DefeatUForever']So is anyone else going to be calling to prank them nonstop? *67 is an amazing feature[/QUOTE]

I'm half ashamed and half proud that this thought has crossed my mind as well...particularly, in conjunction with this website:

http://www.realmofdarkness.net/pranks/celebsoundboardsmain.htm

Anybody who's heard the Dr. Phil prank calls on Youtube knows exactly what I'm talking about. :)
 
[quote name='ravenz7']Just thought I would share an email I received from the ECA yesterday when I asked about sending a fax to cancel. I had asked this since on the forums they were mentioning they wanted a cancellation letter because it was a hard copy.

Hello Chris,

Snail mail is the only way to cancel. Thanks for reaching out. You will need to send a letter to the ECA attention Accounting 30 day's prior to your membership expiring. Please include first name, last name , email address, date card was charged, and the last 4 digits of your cc.
Funny he tells me to send more information than what Gypsyfly has said we need to include.[/QUOTE]


What kind of rinkydink system do they have over there, where they need all that information to look you up and cancel membership? It's not like I'm trying to verify my identity with my bank.
 
[quote name='Dead of Knight']This is either Hal or one of his troll mods or just a plain vanilla troll. The Amazon discount isn't even the issue here. It's the illegal and fraudulent TOS changes and the piss poor attitude of Hal and his cohorts that's the issue. Piss off. If you're trolling just for fun, my apologies.[/QUOTE]My guess is that its the sycophant leonharfs.:lol:
 
@Reira.

Thanks for your efforts. Added my information on the document. Let us know if you need help with anything else.

Thanks again,
mis0 ;)
 
[quote name='ravenz7']Just thought I would share an email I received from the ECA yesterday when I asked about sending a fax to cancel. I had asked this since on the forums they were mentioning they wanted a cancellation letter because it was a hard copy.

Hello Chris,

Snail mail is the only way to cancel. Thanks for reaching out. You will need to send a letter to the ECA attention Accounting 30 day's prior to your membership expiring. Please include first name, last name , email address, date card was charged, and the last 4 digits of your cc.
Funny he tells me to send more information than what Gypsyfly has said we need to include.[/QUOTE]
I really hope this is a mistake because now this feels slightly scamy. So now every letter sent is invalid if they don't have the extra info? o_O Thank god I used the account that I don't keep all my money in with this site. How long did they take to respond to your email btw?
 
[quote name='Reira']Last chance to enter your info and get your e-mail hidden right away. I'm going to bed soon.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Got 139 names listed, but some are duplicates (same person, 2 accounts) and some I still need e-mail and/or username. You have to actually type your e-mail, not "hidden." I will change it to "hidden" when I copy your info into the private copy.[/QUOTE]

Thank you for making this. :applause:
 
I'll just note that I did NOT pay $20 for my membership. I signed up when it was free, and I did so for the $20 Amazon deal. I didn't abuse the deal (in fact, I only used it once, and for a game that was a gift, no less).

That doesn't make me any less annoyed that I have to jump through a bunch of hoops if I want to cancel my account. What the ECA is doing is utter bull. If any regular company tried to do it, they'd be ripped to shreds; only the fact that they're on the fringe of the consumer mainstream is keeping the ECA out of the media's eye.

But far beyond the inconvenience of it all, the ECA has shown an active interest in completely boning its members. This has nothing to do with the Amazon discount; it has everything to do with unsubscribing, with the draconian moderation of their forums, and most of all, with their flouting of the law for no apparent reason. They're willing to go to great lengths and make up a whole lot of crap in order to defend a series of actions that are a) illogical; and b) against the interest of an awful lot of their members.

If they wanted to limit membership to only those who are focused on the lobbying side of things, they shouldn't have offered free membership, nor should they have plugged it as an economically advantageous thing. Clearly lobbying was not their primary motivation. Treating the "free members" differently from the members who paid dues is stupid and counterproductive to their stated goals. And their means of doing so only compound the issue.

I guess all that is my drawn-out way of saying that I reciprocate the ECA's attitude toward me: they can suck it.
 
This is the signature of a forum member from the ECA forums. I thought it was funny enough that it deserved reposting here.


"EULAs are a real and tangible problem... Quite simply, they're out of control... these contracts have become so unwieldy that they regularly infringe on consumer rights. Many would likely be unenforceable in a court of law. Others, consumers would be shocked to find out what all of that fine print actually meant." - Hal Halpin

Oh irony.
 
I gotta get in on this thread...it's just too juicy. Even though I'm affected I can't happen to be kind of excited...worst case I'm out a few dollars, but there is much more at stake, and it's nice to see CAG nation rally around something.

Full disclosure:
I joined about a day after the initial Amazon promotion was announced. I paid my $15 using my student discount. I have absolutely *zero* interest in what the company does. Never have been; definitely not now. I just wanted the promotion because I shop on Amazon...a lot. Call me cheap, call me greedy, call me selfish...whatever. Clearly, I am one of the people that the ECA doesn't want in their ranks...and that's fine. I have to imagine most of the CAGs who signed up probably fall in this bucket. They just wanted the discount. ECA dangled a discount in front of me that was too enticing to pass up.

At this point it's probably beating a dead horse, but it's startling to me how waaay off the ECA is here.

Their main points of contention are:
- Member abuse due to the "unwashed masses" ruining the Amazon promotion
- To "recoup their losses" (honestly, why else do you think they're *now* pulling this?) they are making it much more difficult for the user to cancel in an effort to *punish* those who abused the system.

The PROBLEM is you can't have it both ways! It's like trying to lure a wild animal with food and then hitting them with a shovel when they don't listen to your commands. I mean come ON...did they really have this utopian vision where, "hey, if I can just get Joe Gamer to check us out, we'll have a loyal follower for life! I know...let's give them a free membership and dangle shiny toys in front of them...they'll have to like us then! What could go wrong?? *stuff goes wrong* Oh crap...we just got screwed...let's punish those bastards".

I mean the stance that is being taken is this mindset. And is absolutely NOT how a legitimate professional organization should present themselves. The CUSTOMER is always right. You piss off the customer and you're dead. The comments from the president is that basically he's offended people just wanted the discount. And it's unbelievably baffling to think otherwise. I realize you're trying to grow your base, but you're now in a PR nightmare, and I don't care what you say; negative press is not rewarding in this case. You're going to lose all your "sponsors", and 90% of your base once they learn of this incident. They really have no ethical, moral, or even LEGAL ground to stand on here.

I am confident there will be something to come from this mess. I have a few months to watch and see how this unfolds...at this point I have no interest in wasting any money sending them mail. I am confident they will need to "reinstitute" the "unintentional" cancellation method at some point.

I have to go back to this though...say what you will about people who abused the system, but it's THE ECA'S FAULT.

First, they decided to implement a program with Amazon that
a) Used non-unique codes that could be used by ANYONE (wow, that's a disaster waiting to happen)
b) Created new codes after the original codes expired, but never verified the "old" codes stopped working (uh oh...)
c) Opened the floodgates by allowing people to obtain "free" membership...(and boom goes the dynamite)

The ineptness of putting together a technically unsound promotion is on their hands. Wag your finger at people who abused it, but it's still on them.

I won't even bother going into the "main" new point here which is the auto-cancellation fiasco. I clearly remembered the button that allowed you to cancel...it was there for a long time. I debated whether or not to cancel my account immediately because this was during the time the codes were "in limbo". I'm sure we're all still waiting for comments on this as I don't think they've been properly addressed.

I have to imagine this is far from over. If some changes aren't made this company is o-v-e-r (although I still have serious doubts they will ever recover from this). The last time CAG got this pissed off at a company...a major retailer went out of business a few months later. Don't fuck with CAG.
 
[quote name='PDJ']Don't worry I only read your first and last paragraphs, so it sounded ok to me :p

On Kotaku's article they said they sent a message questioning the ECA about the whole issue but have yet to be contacted about it. IMO that's a pretty big site that I know a lot of people keep up with. Something has to happen in the next month about this issue, until then it's good to see them receiving more and more pressure about the issue.

http://kotaku.com/5417143/entertainment-consumers-outraged-over-eca-cancellation-policy

Edit: Raven that's ridiculous.... customer service isn't on the same page either. I don't think anyone knows what's going on except for Halburger himself[/QUOTE]
Someone understood my crappy writing! :D Everyone is letting them "comment" though so they just pin it on the people to try to justify it instead of actually fixing the issue to make it's members happy and to keep a few. This is their job though, they don't just hop on a side with out the facts first so I haz no problem with this. Don't get me wrong, when I saw how fast the news spread I was proud of the internet and I still am... :cry:

I should stop typing now and sleep before I start posting about pop tarts and aliens......
 
Question to anyone who has actually canceled you account successfully:

Can you still access the member benefits and coupon codes and whatnot?
 
[quote name='kodave']Question to anyone who has actually canceled you account successfully:

Can you still access the member benefits and coupon codes and whatnot?[/QUOTE]

I haven't read 100% of the thread, but I'd be surprised if anyone has any evidence of cancelling their account successfully. Chances are, the most anyone will get is delivery confirmation of their cancellation letter. Aside from that, everyone will just be waiting until their billing cycle ends and they either do or don't get charged again.

Once you've paid for (or entered a coupon for) a year's membership, they have a contractual obligation to provide that for you. Just as with any other subscription service (Blockbuster, the gym, whatever...), once you cancel, your membership continues as normal until the end of the billing cycle you've already paid for. If they try to do anything else, they either have to give a pro rated refund or they're in violation of their contract, absent specific contractual provisions otherwise (see: cell phone contracts).
 
[quote name='Reira']Last chance to enter your info and get your e-mail hidden right away. I'm going to bed soon.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Got 139 names listed, but some are duplicates (same person, 2 accounts) and some I still need e-mail and/or username. You have to actually type your e-mail, not "hidden." I will change it to "hidden" when I copy your info into the private copy.[/QUOTE]


I'd totally enter my info, if I understood how to use Google docs
 
Too tired for more venom. Hate hate, anger...bleh internet.

In any case, I'm canceling by snail mail in the upcoming months or if they ever bring out a new way before summer next year. I did pay for my membership, in july.

What a waste of potential ECA. I'm disappointed this is as far as you get.
 
Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. My post was not a joke post, I am not Hal, I am not a troll, and I don't work for them. But I felt a dissenting opinion was warranted, as unpopular as it may be. These guys aren't a company, they're a non-profit organization. Stop expecting them to act like Netflix. Again, the people who joined specifically for the Amazon discount should never have joined the ECA to begin with. You're just an abuser if you did that, sorry. It should teach you a lesson about joining orgranizations just to get a discount. Guess what, I joined because I believed in their cause, not because I wanted "discounts". The discounts didn't even exist when I joined. But, they had to add discounts to grow membership because so few of you would have joined otherwise, because you don't understand politics, how we are viewed outside the gaming realm, etc, etc, and probably don't care. ECA's only real mistake is that their benefit and discount system attracted too many folks who only cared about "discounts". If you want to know their cause is and what they are about, try reading the actual web site, instead of going to the Benefits page directly.
 
[quote name='Llamas Notsheep']If they try to do anything else, they either have to give a pro rated refund or they're in violation of their contract, absent specific contractual provisions otherwise (see: cell phone contracts).[/QUOTE]

It's in their terms that they don't offer any kind of refunds.

[quote name='ElektroDragon']Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. My post was not a joke post, I am not Hal, I am not a troll, and I don't work for them. But I felt a dissenting opinion was warranted, as unpopular as it may be. These guys aren't a company, they're a non-profit organization. Stop expecting them to act like Netflix. Again, the people who joined specifically for the Amazon discount should never have joined the ECA to begin with. You're just an abuser if you did that, sorry. It should teach you a lesson about joining orgranizations just to get a discount. Guess what, I joined because I believed in their cause, not because I wanted "discounts". The discounts didn't even exist when I joined. But, they had to add discounts to grow membership because so few of you would have joined otherwise, because you don't understand politics, how we are viewed outside the gaming realm, etc, etc, and probably don't care. ECA's only real mistake is that their benefit and discount system attracted too many folks who only cared about "discounts". If you want to know their cause is and what they are about, try reading the actual web site, instead of going to the Benefits page directly.[/QUOTE]

There's seriously so much wrong with your post, I don't know where to begin. I won't even bother. What I will address, though, is your bullshit about the discounts, which seems to the ECA company line, now. The discounts were there, as you pointed out (about the only thing you got right) to attract the members. By increasing their numbers, they hoped to gain the power to get more done. It's called one hand washing the other. It doesn't matter why anyone signed up. It helped the ECA. It's a lot more convincing when a group with 100,000 members, let's say for argument's sake, is pestering you than when a group of, say, 20,000 is doing the same thing. And for the same reason, Halpin McDuck himself wrote that article in Game Informer and offered the code for a free membership. If they didn't want us "unwashed masses" joining, they should have never had benefits and not have offered a free membership. They should have just continued with their three dozen members, and their group that apparently gets nothing done.
 
It's obvious to me that simple membership cancellation can easily be accomplished via many methods, including email, no matter what the ECA comes up with. And that the insistence that cancellation now is only valid via confirmed delivery snail mail is a petty, fraudulent attempt to cause members wanting out unnecessary effort and expense.
I will not jump through hoops for these morons.
As far as I'm concerned I canceled my membership back in early October via their website's cancellation button. I was never informed by the ECA this method of cancellation was not valid - even though they have my email address. With this in mind I sent the following email to the ECA:
I canceled my membership back in October 2009 (order ####) using the cancellation button on my user account page.
I was never notified this method was not functional – and still have yet to be notified to the contrary.
I consider my membership canceled (and not to be renewed) as of October 4, 2009.
Any attempt to charge my card for a membership I have already canceled via your website set up will be disputed.
I have already advised my card issuer of this.
Regardless of your changing policies as of December 2009 – I have been advised that my original cancellation is valid.
If, for whatever reason, your records do not reflect this you are now informed (for the second time) that I want my membership canceled at once:
user name, etc
Whether they like it or not - this email is enough proof for my card issuer that I have canceled. As far as I'm concerned they can either cancel or not, but this is adequate to dispute any future 19.99 charge. Assuming the ECA is even a viable organization next year - which I seriously doubt.
I've had less evidence than this to successfully dispute charges in the past with companies far more predatory than the impotent ECA.
 
[quote name='ElektroDragon']Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. My post was not a joke post, I am not Hal, I am not a troll, and I don't work for them. But I felt a dissenting opinion was warranted, as unpopular as it may be. These guys aren't a company, they're a non-profit organization. Stop expecting them to act like Netflix. Again, the people who joined specifically for the Amazon discount should never have joined the ECA to begin with. You're just an abuser if you did that, sorry. It should teach you a lesson about joining orgranizations just to get a discount. Guess what, I joined because I believed in their cause, not because I wanted "discounts". The discounts didn't even exist when I joined. But, they had to add discounts to grow membership because so few of you would have joined otherwise, because you don't understand politics, how we are viewed outside the gaming realm, etc, etc, and probably don't care. ECA's only real mistake is that their benefit and discount system attracted too many folks who only cared about "discounts". If you want to know their cause is and what they are about, try reading the actual web site, instead of going to the Benefits page directly.[/QUOTE]

Irrelevant. We don't need your self righteous thoughts here. Stop posting, thanks.
 
[quote name='ElektroDragon']Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. My post was not a joke post, I am not Hal, I am not a troll, and I don't work for them. But I felt a dissenting opinion was warranted, as unpopular as it may be. These guys aren't a company, they're a non-profit organization. Stop expecting them to act like Netflix. Again, the people who joined specifically for the Amazon discount should never have joined the ECA to begin with. You're just an abuser if you did that, sorry. It should teach you a lesson about joining orgranizations just to get a discount. Guess what, I joined because I believed in their cause, not because I wanted "discounts". The discounts didn't even exist when I joined. But, they had to add discounts to grow membership because so few of you would have joined otherwise, because you don't understand politics, how we are viewed outside the gaming realm, etc, etc, and probably don't care. ECA's only real mistake is that their benefit and discount system attracted too many folks who only cared about "discounts". If you want to know their cause is and what they are about, try reading the actual web site, instead of going to the Benefits page directly.[/QUOTE]

Since you've been a member for so long can you tell me what the ECA has done for my rights as a gamer?
 
[quote name='ElektroDragon']Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. My post was not a joke post, I am not Hal, I am not a troll, and I don't work for them. But I felt a dissenting opinion was warranted, as unpopular as it may be. These guys aren't a company, they're a non-profit organization. Stop expecting them to act like Netflix. Again, the people who joined specifically for the Amazon discount should never have joined the ECA to begin with. You're just an abuser if you did that, sorry. It should teach you a lesson about joining orgranizations just to get a discount. Guess what, I joined because I believed in their cause, not because I wanted "discounts". The discounts didn't even exist when I joined. But, they had to add discounts to grow membership because so few of you would have joined otherwise, because you don't understand politics, how we are viewed outside the gaming realm, etc, etc, and probably don't care. ECA's only real mistake is that their benefit and discount system attracted too many folks who only cared about "discounts". If you want to know their cause is and what they are about, try reading the actual web site, instead of going to the Benefits page directly.[/QUOTE]

Wait wait wait, so you're saying that its ok for them to "add discounts to grow membership" but not ok for people to join for the discounts? And just because they are listed as a non-profit, does not mean their cause is actually noble, no matter the claim they may make. If you know anyone that actually buys that give me a couple weeks and I'll have a "non-profit" set up that they can donate to.
 
[quote name='ElektroDragon']Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. My post was not a joke post, I am not Hal, I am not a troll, and I don't work for them. But I felt a dissenting opinion was warranted, as unpopular as it may be. These guys aren't a company, they're a non-profit organization. Stop expecting them to act like Netflix. Again, the people who joined specifically for the Amazon discount should never have joined the ECA to begin with. You're just an abuser if you did that, sorry. It should teach you a lesson about joining orgranizations just to get a discount. Guess what, I joined because I believed in their cause, not because I wanted "discounts". The discounts didn't even exist when I joined. But, they had to add discounts to grow membership because so few of you would have joined otherwise, because you don't understand politics, how we are viewed outside the gaming realm, etc, etc, and probably don't care. ECA's only real mistake is that their benefit and discount system attracted too many folks who only cared about "discounts". If you want to know their cause is and what they are about, try reading the actual web site, instead of going to the Benefits page directly.[/QUOTE]

^A self righteous troll is still a troll.

This situation has nothing to do with why anyone joined and the fact that you and people like Hal Halpin blame it on the Amazon code abusers is ridiculous. And even if it was the fault of people who abused the Amazon code, the fault goes back to the ECA for mismanaging the GIMAG free membership code. This present controversy is all about the procedure that the ECA is making ANY member go through, whether they've been there 5 years or 5 minutes, and whether they paid or they didn't, to get their credit card information removed and their membership canceled.

Believe it or not, some people may just went to TURN OFF the auto-renew, which is what sparked this whole controversy in the first place, so they can make a conscious decision at the end of 1 year whether to pay again or not. But the ECA is still taking their time with (re)enabling this option, leaving many people just wanting to cancel now.

The only problem is the cancellation procedure is now more complicated than one might expect an online consumer group's cancellation policy to be, which raises valid criticisms of the organization and, as we've seen, various legal arguments to indicate these procedures of the ECA may violate the laws of the state of Connecticut.

The ECA might very well do "good work" on our behalf but the way they've treated ALL of their members through all of this has made what appears to be the large majority of the interested parties not trust them as an organization anymore. Hal Halpin's condescending and threatening tone didn't help matters either.

The solution to this problem is easy: The ECA needs to bring back the option to disable the auto-renew through their website, and make sure it actually works. Then people make a conscious decision at the end of their one year on whether to renew or not, and those that were abusers and just don't care will be flushed out of the system when they fail to renew. It also avoids any possible "traps" with tricky Terms of Membership loopholes that a consumer group like the ECA should, and has in the past, advocate against.

But who knows how long it'll take the ECA to realize that.
 
[quote name='ElektroDragon']Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. I am not a troll. [/QUOTE]

Yes, you are.
 
[quote name='ElektroDragon']Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. My post was not a joke post, I am not Hal, I am not a troll, and I don't work for them. But I felt a dissenting opinion was warranted, as unpopular as it may be. These guys aren't a company, they're a non-profit organization. Stop expecting them to act like Netflix. Again, the people who joined specifically for the Amazon discount should never have joined the ECA to begin with. You're just an abuser if you did that, sorry. It should teach you a lesson about joining orgranizations just to get a discount. Guess what, I joined because I believed in their cause, not because I wanted "discounts". The discounts didn't even exist when I joined. But, they had to add discounts to grow membership because so few of you would have joined otherwise, because you don't understand politics, how we are viewed outside the gaming realm, etc, etc, and probably don't care. ECA's only real mistake is that their benefit and discount system attracted too many folks who only cared about "discounts". If you want to know their cause is and what they are about, try reading the actual web site, instead of going to the Benefits page directly.[/QUOTE]


NOT A BIG DEAL? Let me clue you in right now buddy- I paid for membership a day before the free promo started. I didn't mind because I thought I was paying for a worthwhile cause.

Then about 6 weeks ago I decided to cancel my charge card and go with a company that has a lower interest rate. I tried to cancel my account and found that the button to cancel was gone. I emailed the ECA to cancel and was told that I had to snail mail them. I copied their terms of service to them ( and at that time they said we could CALL, use the website, or email them to cancel ).

THEY REFUSED TO LET ME CANCEL. So 4 weeks ago exactly, I sent in a snail mail to them. Guess what- THEY DIDN'T CANCEL MY ACCOUNT.

So here I am now wanting to cancel- but the people at the ECA are not doing their job. How is that not a big deal? People want to cancel. But many of us can't. We jumped through ECA's hoops and they still haven't canceled our account. That to me is a VERY BIG DEAL! When I signed up- ECA's terms were that I could cancel at any time. Well guess what.... I can't!
 
[quote name='ElektroDragon']Wow, there's a lot of nerd rage here over something that's really not a big deal. My post was not a joke post, I am not Hal, I am not a troll, and I don't work for them. But I felt a dissenting opinion was warranted, as unpopular as it may be. These guys aren't a company, they're a non-profit organization. Stop expecting them to act like Netflix. Again, the people who joined specifically for the Amazon discount should never have joined the ECA to begin with. You're just an abuser if you did that, sorry. It should teach you a lesson about joining orgranizations just to get a discount. Guess what, I joined because I believed in their cause, not because I wanted "discounts". The discounts didn't even exist when I joined. But, they had to add discounts to grow membership because so few of you would have joined otherwise, because you don't understand politics, how we are viewed outside the gaming realm, etc, etc, and probably don't care. ECA's only real mistake is that their benefit and discount system attracted too many folks who only cared about "discounts". If you want to know their cause is and what they are about, try reading the actual web site, instead of going to the Benefits page directly.[/QUOTE]

As somebody mentioned earlier in the thread, there's always someone who feels the need to defend a person/group's actions, regardless of how despicable they are. And it seems all anybody on the ECA's side wants to do is talk about the Amazon coupon issue. Ok, so let's talk about the Amazon issue.

Even if I give you the benefit of the doubt, and just believe everything you say to be true, can you honestly tell me that the way the ECA has handled this entire situation is without flaw? As you've stated, "they're the victim here". So, it wasn't a mistake to offer the Amazon codes in a free for all, first come first served manner?

As CheapyD mentioned on the CAGcast, he pointed this out to them in APRIL. He warned Hal that this method was ripe for abuse, and that people could create as many codes as they wanted and give them to whomever they wanted. It was even mentioned at one point that they (whether this is Amazon or the ECA, I don't know) were working on a system of unique multi-use codes that would be tied to each user's account. Not only would this have prevented the "unwashed masses" from stacking, but it would have been a far more organized and reliable system.

Then, without having the kinks in the coupon system worked out, the ECA decided to offer free memberships. Yeah, yeah, Hal wants to claim that the code was only intended for "readers of the article", but what did he think was going to happen??? I know he says he's not a "forums guy" and he probably hardly knows how to turn on his computer, but was there no one to advise him of the negative effect it could have??? But of course, that's not his fault either, right? Why should we expect him to have common sense and know how to run an organization? He's a victim. Poor Hal-Hal.

And I can promise you, without question, this is what caused Amazon to break their ties with the ECA. Yes, the stacking was hurting business, but the coding that allowed it was Amazon's fault, and they took the necessary steps to clean it up. But how could any big retailer, offering an unprecedented discount to a relatively unknown organization, be happy about the fact that said discount was being given away to anybody at no charge? I seriously doubt that Amazon signed off on giving free access to such a precious commodity. None of the responsibility for that falls on the ECA???

And this doesn't even begin to address the true problem here, which is the ethical issue of altering your TOS without notifying members...many of whom believed they had already canceled their service. Website glitch or not (which is still a very flimsy excuse, in my opinion), how can you argue that this organization has no responsibility to its members to notify them that certain problems have occurred with the site and as a result, policies have changed? My cell phone service and credit card company notify me when the terms of my agreement have changed (and even give me a choice of opting out), and they don't claim to be advocating for my rights as a consumer. Take off your blinders, man.
 
[quote name='Reira']OK, I'm signing off for tonight. You're welcome, everyone.
I prefer "goddess." ;)[/QUOTE]

Thanks again. Added myself then clicked "save and close". Clicked back on the link and I was still there so looks like I got it right.
 
[quote name='n8rockerasu']
As CheapyD mentioned on the CAGcast, he pointed this out to them in APRIL. He warned Hal that this method was ripe for abuse, and that people could create as many codes as they wanted and give them to whomever they wanted.
[/QUOTE]

Juicy. Downloaded it to listen.
 
[quote name='Vortextk']Juicy. Downloaded it to listen.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I wasn't sure if everyone was aware that he did address it in the most recent show. Not that I'd encourage anyone to skip through the first 30 riveting minutes of discussion, but the ECA stuff starts at 31:40. :)
 
[quote name='Reira']Last chance to enter your info and get your e-mail hidden right away. I'm going to bed soon.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Got 139 names listed, but some are duplicates (same person, 2 accounts) and some I still need e-mail and/or username. You have to actually type your e-mail, not "hidden." I will change it to "hidden" when I copy your info into the private copy.[/QUOTE]

Thankyou, I added my info.
 
"BBB Rating for Entertainment Consumers Association

Based on BBB files, Entertainment Consumers Association has a BBB Rating of NR .

Reasons for this rating include:
This business is not currently rated. BBB has recently received numerous complaints against this business, and will issue a rating after it has fully evaluated them."

Mwahahaha!
 
[quote name='Reira']Last chance to enter your info and get your e-mail hidden right away. I'm going to bed soon.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Got 139 names listed, but some are duplicates (same person, 2 accounts) and some I still need e-mail and/or username. You have to actually type your e-mail, not "hidden." I will change it to "hidden" when I copy your info into the private copy.[/QUOTE]

\Thanks. Added info.
 
Added my info to the google docs. Hope they pay attention to it.
We need more people to add their info so they know it's a big deal for us.
Thanks!
 
[quote name='Azul_KoolAid']So is it too late to sign the google form?[/QUOTE]

I don't think so, Reira just went to bed. I think she'll be back editing the list later today and hiding email addresses. I'll add my name in a few hours.

And I'm so happy that we managed to drag some ECA supporters over here. Amazing how quickly their arguments get dissected when their mods can't delete anything.

Off to check my emails for anything from other ECA-affiliated businesses or the CT AG.

EDIT - [quote name='bigdaddybruce44']HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH! Seriously, this kind of reminds of you when a kingdom is falling under siege, and they start giving weapons to any male between 15 and 65.[/QUOTE]

Hahahaha, it's like Berlin in April of 1945. Quick! Arm the Hitler Youth, arm the Volkssturm! The mutha-fuckin' Red Army is coming and they're fucking pissed!

EDIT AGAIN - I got an email back from Target due to the comment I sent them about carrying ECA membership cards. The rep that mailed me said that they can't find any evidence that they carry them. I just wrote him back and told him to simply type "eca" in the search box on the front page at Target.com. We'll see what they say back to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dont think posting Hal's information should make the community look bad. After all, Hal has all of our information, he knows where we live, he has access to our credit card information, our phone numbers ETC.

Futhermore, the only person looking bad should and is Hal. How can he honestly 'work' for the gaming community, talking about issues like the EULA, when he himself has written one of the worst? How can a guy thats only in his 40's and advocating for gamers not get 'forums'? This guy should be brought down along with the ECA, if the records are correct they rake in a good chunk of money.

Being a 'non-profit' does not mean you cannot make millions. IMHO, alot of these groups should lose that label because people think 'non-profit' = good/honest company. In realtiy, alot/most ' non profits' make lots of profit, it just has to stay in the company. Mr Hal could be paying himself a very nice salary for doing what?

I joined ECA for 'free' thought they might do ok work, + bonus, never even used a promo. However as soon as I started reading the forums, and some of the 'work' the ECA did, it becaume obivous they were nearly worthless. The totaltiran control, the 'we must listen to both sides', the tone that Hal and his minions know better then all is obvious. IMHO the ECA should be permentaly tainted, and destroyed. They are a bad organtization, and IMHO having a bad organization reperesent gamers is worse then having no one repersent us. At this rate the ECA will sell out all gamers for a big chunk of cash, just so Hal can buy a house or two next to mommy
 
[quote name='USB Cable']I really hope this is a mistake because now this feels slightly scamy. So now every letter sent is invalid if they don't have the extra info? o_O Thank god I used the account that I don't keep all my money in with this site. How long did they take to respond to your email btw?[/QUOTE]

It took them less than 24hrs. I received a response just before the story went all over the internet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top