[quote name='spmahn']The build it into your price argument is complete bullshit. The item you are selling is only worth whatever someone is willing to pay you for it. If item X is only worth $20, and people are only willing to pay $20 for it, then you're only going to sell it for $20, not $27.95 with free shipping, it doesn't work that way. The average consumer associates shipping as a separate cost on top of the price of the item, when you bundle it all together people will mentally think they are getting ripped off because they paid a higher price for the item, and you will be undercut by everyone.
I do blame eBay, I do blame Amazon, and I do blame Paypal. If the Post Office is facing some sort of epidemic of people screwing them when using these services, then they should stand up and blame these guys too because they're just as much a victim of their shitty policies.
Oh, and yes, every single time I bring a package to the post office, it gets weighed because the actual weight gets printed on the receipt and 9 time out of 10 I can eyeball it within 1-2 ounces.[/QUOTE]
Christ there are so many issues with the way you think.
Paragraph 1 - An item is ultimately worth what a buyer will pay for it at any given time. But that doesn't mean you have to sell it at X time.
Regardless, no matter if you're trying to make a profit or minimize a loss, you can still calculate what you paid, the shipping costs, and what you will lose in fees and build it into your price to get a specific net profit while offering free shipping. If your price is too high to be competitive, free shipping or not, then it won't sell for a while or ever. If this is
consistently a problem for you, it means you're doing it wrong! You shouldn't be in the business of re-selling or flipping if you consistently can't at least break even
and have to resort to scamming the USPS. (Putting aside other reasons to take a loss.) If you're just selling shit you don't want anymore, then that's a different story and chances are you're going to be taking a loss on what you paid for it or what the value of the item actually is. If you're not happy with what you're going to get back even if its a technical net loss and again,
have to resort to short changing the USPS, why bother selling in the first place?
But again, on both Amazon and eBay, if its sorted by price, its combining price + shipping. Some buyers may be mentally challenged and not understand total price vs. asking price + separate shipping, but those sites spell it out for them.
All things being equal, if someone on one of those sites buys an item because it was $5 + $10 s/h instead of your item that was $10 w/ free s/h, there's not much you can do about that kind of stupidity. If they're sorting by time, distance, or best match, then obviously they have other concerns than price.
But none of the above excuses
RIPPING OFF THE USPS.
Paragraph 2 - "If the Post Office is facing some sort of epidemic of people screwing them when using these services, then they should stand up and blame these guys too because they're just as much a victim of their shitty policies."
NO NO NO NO. What is the major

ing malfunction in your head? There is a subset of people trying to screw the Post Office, but those people have been doing it well before Amazon and eBay. Amazon and eBay aren't the problem and the USPS has no reason to blame those companies.
THE BLAME LIES WITH SACKS OF SHIT LIKE YOU WHO AT LEAST CLAIM TO USE LESS POSTAGE THAN LEGALLY REQUIRED TO SAVE A BUCK OR TWO. How many more

ing scape goats are you going to come up with before you acknowledge you're an immoral/unethical/shitty person for your little scheme? But then again, I have reason to believe you have no idea what you're doing because:
Paragraph 3 - "the actual weight gets printed on the receipt and 9 time out of 10 I can eyeball it within 1-2 ounces." If you're eyeballing weight within 1 to 2 ounces, there is no way you're shaving A BUCK OR TWO off every one of your shipments. That's your entire

ing claim going back to the post that initiated this particular discussion. If you end up paying for an ounce or two less than the item actually is, you're only saving like 40 cents on first class mail. If you're doing Parcel Post or Media Mail, those are priced in ranges. Media Mail is a flat price per each successive pound. I believe Parcel Post is similar but also increased depending on the distance it must go. If you're undershooting by an ounce or two then it doesn't matter as long as you're in the right weight range, and even then the USPS isn't going to crucify you for being off an ounce or two - but that's a big difference between your initial claim of saving a dollar or two per shipment.
So what is it? Are you ripping the post office off a whole dollar or two every time you ship something, or are you just within an ounce or two so it practically makes not a damn difference in the price you pay except maybe a few dimes with First Class Mail? Get your story straight.