It just seems a strange format to employ every time you reply to someone to argue/refute them. It is very logical, but this isn't a debate forum.
True, but even in normal cases it enhances readability and makes things clearer and more concise. It also cuts down on the number of misunderstandings a passage of text can create.
And it can make you come off like you think you're better than everyone.
No, if anything, I would think the tone, not the formatting, of what I write would be more likely to inspire that sort of reaction.
It's not going to go any way towards people actually understanding your opinions and considering them.
More often than not, it will. Since the points are more clearly defined and seperated, it's easier to follow.
It's going to tick people off. It's annoying, and I think you know that.
Considering Wshakspear's opinion on the same issue, it hardly seems unanimous. I've got to agree with him on the issue. It makes things easier to follow and less ambigious. I hardly see how that can be a bad thing.
What is it that compels you to go off on people at such length?
I saw what I feel needs to be said. More often than not, what I write is fairly concise. It's the repetition of the earlier post that makes it appear larger.
You must understand, people have different opinions about what is morally/ethically right and wrong. Does it make you somehow feel better to make these kind of posts, or do you actually think you are going to influence people?
Yes. If people aren't made aware that something is fraud and/or illegal, they are going to think it's a great idea. That's bad for everyone.
If Blockbuster wants to let me use a coupon and give me an extra $5 per game, I'M GOING TO LET THEM!
If you go into the store knowingly trying to use a copied coupon and violate the written terms, it's coupon fraud, and nothing more or less.
Just because it doesn't bother you doesn't change that.
Ditto if they want to let me get $5 extra and then do a preorder deal, even though technically you can only do one offer. I must really be a terrible person, greedy, shame on me. Now I PERSONALLY think that photocopying a coupon that says "No Reproductions" is dishonest and I wouldn't do it.
While there are gradations of right and wrong, going around specifically spreading misinformation isn't good. One person doing something is an individual act. A few people is an anomoly. A couple hundred people is stasticially significant. Considering the volume of readers and posters on the board, it's just bad policy to allow a scam/fraud to run unopposed.
But unless someone asked me their opinion I'm not going to make it a point to go shoving it down someone's throat.
He offered up his scheme as a "great idea". That's all the opening I need to refute the validity of said "great idea"
You probably don't care what I think, just like most people won't care what you think about them in all of your posts.
Actually, I do, and you do raise a few good points.
But I think that most people by now understand where you stand on these issues, don't scam, don't try to get over, stay on the straight an narrow, we get it, maybe you don't have to post the same theme that much anymore? Just a suggestion of course.
While you may have a point, there is a high turnover rate here, and from time to time large influxes of new users. If you look it's often a new user that I get in a discussion with each time. If my viewpoint was that well known, people wouldn't keep treading the same ground.. especially in front of me.