From your spoiler:
"2) I can see how you might interpret my post as passive aggressive, but I leave out names SPECIFICALLY not to single anyone out. Lol, the irony is that I'm trying NOT to attack anyone directly. Unlike the people who constantly are making "breakfuss hur dur dur" snipes."
Insulting people without "naming" them is BAITING. That's exactly what it is.
Imagine if i posted "people that defend polygon are

ing naive" in a conversation here that you weren't involved in.
That's clearly baiting you. It's no different from the post I quoted from you, baiting a bunch of us. You insulted us and our position when we weren't engaged in a conversation, and the fact that you didn't name anyone makes it all the more baiting. Your statement was clearly "fighting words" -- clearly insulting other people's positions and accusing them of being various things.
You claiming "I wasn't trying to elicit a response" is inconsequential, because you can claim that about anything people point out as baiting.
Pay up. Seriously. You're called out. I gave a clear example. Admit you're wrong for once, or just wriggle out of it and renege on your word.