[quote name='pimpster4183']/\ same way with Matt Morgan, he's not over as face or when he was heel, you can tell he's one of the guys who keep getting pushed down everyones throat, kinda feel the same way with that Drew Mcintyre guy. I'd love to see Impact go live and head to head with Raw, shit bring in Flair too. I hope the rumors are true on that.[/QUOTE]
Morgan hasn't done himself any favors with the jailhouse-quality tattoo work he has had done over the years. Especially his back piece. One of the first things I thought when I saw Boris Alexiev debut as Santino (since he was in civvies on Raw) was "I wonder how they're going to cover up his corny as shit tattoos?" The guy has the Led Zeppelin angel on his arm, FFS.
The more I think about it, the more I think TNA's biggest problem is that they're opposite of WWE on one end: while we chastise WWE for shoving guys down our throat and rarely building stars, TNA does the opposite: they shuffle the card too much and pull the trigger on dudes, only to put them on ice a few weeks later. Amazing Red was a jobber with a household name and suddenly he's the X champ; Taz was a villainous mastermind, now he's a fat italian dude whose sole goal on the stick is to remind us he's from brooklyn; MCMG's best angle is to bitch on air about not getting airtime, and then not getting the airtime to prove their point; Jay Lethal was hot, but hasn't done anything of consequence in months. The championships (well, ok, this is like WWE) are hot shotted back and forth with nobody building up the belt at all.
http://www.tnawrestling.com/content/blogsection/5/37/
Look at that roster and try to build a card that makes hierarchical sense in terms of how popular/over the wrestlers are with the fans. Not you as a smart mark, nerd, but if you were going to build a PPV that sold the most to TNA fans (i.e., don't book a Ring of Honor show), what would it look like? There are simply too many possibilities at the top of the card that there's no "diversity" in the roster. On WWE, you get what you pay for with a Santino Marella match. In TNA, a main eventer one month might be a 4-minute curtain jerker the next month. With no logical build. TNA staff thinks that it's self-evident in its presentation, or that an "equitable" card (where anyone can beat anyone at anytime) is a more ideal/realistic approach. What it's done is prevent individuals from standing out as individuals, and failed to build an upper card roster than fans want to see.
There's also the fact that I'd rather get hit in the head with a baseball bat than try to explain any of their gimmick matches. The King of the Mountain and reverse battle royale matches are still

in' absurd to me.