[quote name='Weedy649']I agree with not listing games like Halo 2 and Animal Crossing but i disagree with the 50% on gamerankings. Lord of the Rings 3rd age got a 75% on there but i must say its one of the worst games ive played. It would maybe be worth it at 10 bucks but the graphics are horrible, the story is based on the movie(which i dont mind but it means it isnt new) and the game is just...bad. One of the few games i have returned within the first day playing it.
I liked the movies and didnt overhype this, saw good scores, bought it and was very sad indeed.[/quote]
This is exactly why I made that recommendation. The fact is, the 74% at GameRankings indicates that a substantial number of people would disagree with you. I've seen plenty of positive reviews for this title and fully intend to pick it up when the price is right. By all indications, they went for something very similar to FFX and did a reasonable job considering the short time frame of development and the confines of the material.
Consider your priorities. You disparage a game based on a media license for deriving its plot from that media license. This isn't a TV series where you can slip it in as an unproduced episode ala Buffy, nor is the original author alive to offer a plot line that fits into the big story without offending the fans. Nobody else could get away with that and EA knows it. They already killed one LOTR project that attempted to flesh out parts of distant past in the overall story for which Tolkien didn't supply much detail. LOTR games are going to be based on LOTR. For games that are merely LOTR-ish you have virtually the entire fantasy game genre to date.
Seriously, this list should be limited to those products that gamers with a wide range of tastes can agree is thoroughly free of anything that might cause enjoyment to be experienced, except in mockery of the game itself.
I liked the movies and didnt overhype this, saw good scores, bought it and was very sad indeed.[/quote]
This is exactly why I made that recommendation. The fact is, the 74% at GameRankings indicates that a substantial number of people would disagree with you. I've seen plenty of positive reviews for this title and fully intend to pick it up when the price is right. By all indications, they went for something very similar to FFX and did a reasonable job considering the short time frame of development and the confines of the material.
Consider your priorities. You disparage a game based on a media license for deriving its plot from that media license. This isn't a TV series where you can slip it in as an unproduced episode ala Buffy, nor is the original author alive to offer a plot line that fits into the big story without offending the fans. Nobody else could get away with that and EA knows it. They already killed one LOTR project that attempted to flesh out parts of distant past in the overall story for which Tolkien didn't supply much detail. LOTR games are going to be based on LOTR. For games that are merely LOTR-ish you have virtually the entire fantasy game genre to date.
Seriously, this list should be limited to those products that gamers with a wide range of tastes can agree is thoroughly free of anything that might cause enjoyment to be experienced, except in mockery of the game itself.