[quote name='Tony Stark']its my second fav series...why do you people hate it?[/QUOTE]
Since I could rag on Voyager all day, I'll keep it down.
Voyager is the junk food of Trek. Like comfort food, it's familiar and reassuring. Unlike comfort food, it is not made with love or quality ingredients, and none of it is satisfying or good for you. Voyager is leftover, warmed-over leavings and leftovers, pureed and reheated to make it appear palatable. It is empty calories or cafeteria slop, spooned out by people who don't want to be there and just want their paycheck.
"Blurst of times? You stupid monkey" -- The dreadful, inconsistent writing is all over the place, from the ridiculous number of times the ship was beaten to hell and then clean and shiny next week (despite no starbases anywhere) to over-reliance on reset-button plots and spatial anomalies. Also, Voyager's geography is ridiculous and the writers didn't even bother to keep track of things that blatantly didn't make sense. (I could list them -- how long have you got?)
Premise? What premise? Oh, we left that in the Alpha Quadrant -- Remember the Maquis? The show sure didn't. Their best idea -- a crew of divided loyalties forced to work together to overcome adversity -- was forgotten almost immediately. The Maquis were reduced to a cartoon villain in Seska, then dropped. Once per season, they were dragged out in a stupid episode that reminded everyone how little the writers cared. The whole idea was eventually discarded, along with any consequences. Voyager is not big on consequences.
For seven years, I was Chief Technobabble Officer -- If you weren't Janeway, Seven, or the Doctor, your character was totally shafted. While most series focus on a Big Three, Voyager just gave up. Tell me who Chakotay is. Harry Kim? Name three ways they are different without talking about physical attributes or job descriptions.
Even Tom Paris. Started off bad boy, ended up blancmange. It's less redemption and more "Well, we like Tom, so let's make him likeable and forget about anything problematic." What did he accomplish? Who is he, besides retro holodeck and 20th century fan?
Tuvok? Utterly wasted. Neelix? The Jar Jar of Trek. Kes? Stupid concept that went nowhere. Then we've got a handful of second-stringers that were little more than wallpaper and frequently forgotten.
Janeway, though. God I hate her. Insufferable, autocratic, and know-it-all, Janeway ran things like a dictator. She follows the Prime Directive, except when she doesn't. She tortured and nearly murdered a Starfleet officer, endangered the entire Alpha Quadrant recklessly with her shenanigans in "Endgame", and yet she'll disregard the safety of her crew or give up chances to go home for aliens of the week or even deadly enemies.
Janeway is Starfleet twisted beyond recognition. What's worse is that neither she nor the writers see it. Instead, they hold her up as right, even when she's contradicting her past behavior or doing something so egregiously reckless or wrong. It's complete cognitive dissonance. I can handle a character that has to make tough decisions or compromises, or is willing to bend or break the rules. But then don't tell us how morally right and upstanding she is.
(Aside: I love Kate Mulgrew, though. She never gave less than her best for turning such a hatable, inconsistent mess of a character into something watchable. Voyager the series would have imploded without her.)
And then there's Barbie of Borg. Putting aside the (all-but)naked grab for teenage viewership, Seven assimilated all the other characters on Voyager. She stole Tuvok's dialogue and mannerisms, B'Elanna's know-how and drive, Paris' rebelliousness, Harry's...never mind, Harry never had anything. Her nanoprobes were magic plot devices. They might has well have renamed the series Star Trek: Seven.
(Aside: I love Jeri Ryan, and not for her physical attributes. Like Mulgrew and Robert Picardo, she can work miracles with dumb material. It shows how bad much of Voyager's writing is that these three can only do so much for it.)
Speaking of Picardo, the Doctor was often fun, but the whole holographic rights thing was a can of worms. Largely borrowed from Data (including the ripoff of "Measure of a Man", it takes on quite a different spin when you can copy and paste holographic characters or change them on a whim by adding or deleting subroutines. This was so poorly thought out -- the series implied that everything holographic was a sentient being, or that even the most limited computer program could become sentient by adding a few subroutines. Star Trek often simplified concepts for TV, but this isn't even Sentience for Dummies -- it makes no sense, and invalidates the whole concept. There was an issue and an idea worth exploring here; like the rest of Voyager, it was facile, inconsistent, and poorly written.
Voyager was absolutely the worst for inventing character histories on the spot, just to be used in a single episode and then forgotten. Chakotay was a boxer then he was obsessed with Mars. Tom was obsessed with the ocean. B'Elanna was an adrenaline junkie. Harry was revealed to have a friend and secret crush who was on the ship for years that we never saw or heard mentioned.
It's A Highly Localized Distortion...Again -- Voyager is also notable for the amount of "borrowing" it does. It cannibalized TNG episodes left and right, and when it ran out of those, began remaking its own episodes. Even more notable is that many of these remakes sucked. Voyager couldn't even steal well. "Endgame" is "All Good Things" except crappy, disjointed, and nonsensical. Hell, Voyager is TNG except crappy, disjointed, and nonsensical.