Richard Kain
CAGiversary!
Game enthusiasts like myself who have enough disposable income benefit the most in this scenario. I'm not emotionally invested enough in any one console to limit my selection. I eventually get all the consoles, and find different things to enjoy with all of them. It isn't a cheap proposition, but it is lots of fun!Every console is different. Not sure why anyone would want them all to be the same. If they were then why even have different systems?
At the moment, I would have to say that the Wii U is a better value proposition than either the XBox One or PS4. Both those systems are going to be fresh out the gate with very few titles available for them. Throw in the lack of backwards compatibility, and what you can actually do with them is pretty lean. The Wii U is $100 less than either, comes with at least one game, and has a year's worth of titles available. It also has full Wii backwards compatibility, further broadening the number of titles that it can run. It is also benefiting somewhat from it's own difficulties. The hardships the Wii U has faced in its first year are translating into a lot of low-priced and clearance software. Many of the higher quality launch games and ports from other systems can now be had for very little. An extra $100 for software can stretch quite a bit further than it would for the XBox One and PS4. (which will have virtually no discount titles at launch)
These factors aren't necessarily going to translate into stronger sales for the Wii U. Consumer behavior does not always follow logical or predictable rules. Mindshare is also important, and this is one area where the Wii U is still struggling.
Last edited by a moderator: