[quote name='geko29']...
They can't change the type of memory the processor accesses or how it accesses it without running a huge risk of breaking existing software that depends on things being done the "old" way. In a full software emulation setup, they obviously can. Whether they'll do that or not is debatable.[/quote]
They can do it, they're choosing not to for whatever reason. Like I said, it's a software and hardware engineering issue. There are examples of much funkier things getting pulled off than this. They know how the original memory responds, and can fake that, either in hardware or software.
Don't tell me what I said or what I meant.
You're saying I misquoted you or whatever, and then proceeding to make the same claim again...(?)
Sony already officially announced that the production run of the 80GB models is over. Just because they recalled stock from the channel to resell at a later date doesn't mean they're re-introducing backwards compatibility.
Huh? You're claiming they bought back systems, tore apart the packaging, and are going to repackage and resell it? Possible, but I think it's far more likely they're continuing to make models with backwards compatibility. Maybe they did, but I can't recall that they ever claimed they had quit.
I would guess that they're probably working on emulation. How determined they are to make it work is anybody's guess. But they've very publically stated that they're trying to move the market away from playing old games and on to selling new PS3 titles.
Which is a pretty stupid position for a company in their position. They not only the biggest installed base ever for their previous gen system, but actually their previous gen system still is a current gen system. While they need PS3 development, there's no reason to undermine the PS2.
But I'll wager hard cash that there will never be a 120/160GB PS3 (ie NEW PRODUCTION, not new old stock that was built last year) with a EE+GS under the hood. That cut is permanent, I guarantee.
Well they're continuing to produce BC units now, and I hope you're wrong about this in the future, unless they've introduced full software backwards compatibility by then.
The ones coming out in June were built last year.
Why do you say that?
[quote name='Ryukahn']At some point this year, I'm buying a PS3. Maybe sooner rather than later since funds are ok at the moment. The PS3 I buy
MUST have BC. I don't want to buy a PS2 and a 40 GB PS3 to clutter up my entertainment unit, and I especially don't want to deal with corded PS2 controllers or memory cards, so please don't tell me to just get a PS2 to play PS2 games.
With that out of the way, what are the differences between the 60 GB and the 80 GB? I know 60 GB is practically full BC (a few games don't work) while the 80 GB version is mostly BC (less games work than the 60 GB model). I'm still compiling a list of all the PS2 games I plan to play, but so far I don't recall any issues in BC on either of the systems.
I also know about the MSG4 bundle scheduled to hit in June. However, I have basically no interest in MGS4 and it would most likely just be sold upon purchase of the bundle. I also don't really care about the rumble feature in the DS3 controllers (never really used rumble on PS2/GC/N64/PSX), so if that's the only benefit, then I can do without that if need be.[/quote]
I'm in a similar position. I loved the original Metal Gear and MGS1, liked MGS2, and hated MGS3 and Portable Ops, so almost certainly I'll hate MGS4. I'm expecting I'll play it for a few hours and sell it.
I've also never been impressed by rumble (although I've always thought Sony's implementation was the best-ironic since they gave it up on the PS3 originally).
All that said, I think the new MGS bundle is going to be the way to go. It should have the advantages of the 40GB model but with decent backwards compatibility. This bundle's probably going to be popular, but even still I figure the game will get me a decent amount at Gamestop, which will effectively lower the price of the bundle.
[quote name='dragonsho']I have a few questions regarding the 80gb model and 40gb model. The questions are for both.
Do they both get equally hot?
As hot as the 360?
If so, hot enough that it would cause a system failure down the line?
Is the 40gb really quieter? Please compare noise levels of an 80gb and a 40gb to a 360.[/QUOTE]
This has been addressed by Mana Knight too, but for the heck of it...
If you can't find any Motorstorm bundles, I'm personally waiting for the new 80GB bundle, which should hopefully be the best unit out there.
The "old" PS3 models are louder than the new model, but from tests on a hardware site I think it was like 36db versus 30-still a LONG way from the 60db the 360 produces. (The site Mana Knight is quoting from got higher results for whatever reason, but they're still lower than the 360 results they got.) The old models drew as much power as the 360, but that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with how reliable they'll be. (The 360 has a poor cooling system, and took shortcuts that led to it's high failure rate. That doesn't mean another system with a similar power draw will have a similar failure rate.)