Toy Story Trilogy(10-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo + Digital Copy)

xeno

xeno

CAGiversary!
Feedback
10 (100%)
Deal or not there is a Toy story trilogy coming out for $69.99.
http://www.amazon.com/Story-Trilogy...ef=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1282675703&sr=8-4

41H-9AOZIcL._SS500_.jpg


I
n news today, Disney has issued their Toy Story 3 press release, which confirms that the film will bow in multiple versions: a single-disc DVD (SRP $29.99), a 2-disc Blu-ray (SRP $39.99) and a 4-disc Blu-ray/DVD/Digital Copy Combo (SRP $45.99). You'll also be able to buy a new Ultimate Toy Box 3-Movie Collection (SRP $100) which will include Blu-ray, DVD and Digital Copy versions of all three Toy Story films. Once again, the Toy Story 3 DVD will include the Day & Night animated short, 5 featurettes (Toys!, Paths to Pixar: Editorial, The Gang's All Here, Buzz Lightyear Mission Logs: The Science of Adventure and A Toy's Eye View: Creating a Whole New Land) and 3 Studio Stories shorts (Where's Gordon?, Cereal Bar and Clean Start). To this, the Blu-ray will add a Cine-Explore commentary/viewing mode (with director Lee Unkrich and producer Darla K. Anderson), a Beyond the Toybox alternate commentary track (with story supervisor Jason Katz, supervising technical director Guido Quaroni, production designer Bob Pauley and supervising animators Bobby Podesta and Michael Venturini), the Toy Story Trivia Dash game and 7 more featurettes (Beginnings: Setting a Story in Motion, Bonnie's Playtime: A Story Roundtable, Roundin' Up a Western Opening, Life of a Shot, Goodbye Andy, Accidental Toymakers and The Making of Day & Night). Audio on the Blu-ray will be 7.1 DTS-HD Master Audio. Here's a look at the packaging for the Ultimate Toy Box 3-Movie Collection..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0 Downvote
[quote name='ravenz7']From what I have read in the past the first Disney 3D movie will be Disney's A Christmas Carol, which will be released 2 weeks after Toy Story 3.

http://bluray.ign.com/articles/105/1059043p1.html

Not sure why they picked that movie...I defiantly would have picked Toy Story 3 to be the first.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, they're really making a mess of the whole 3D blu-ray thing. I ended up buying a 3D-capable TV recently because I got a really good deal on it (as in, the same price as the one-model-down non-3D TV that I was going to buy), but I haven't bothered to invest in the glasses yet, and won't until there's enough content to make it worthwhile. As of right now, the only 3D blu-rays that you can buy on the general market are, of all things, Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs (um, no thanks) and Monster House (ok in a pinch, I guess, but hardly worth a several hundred dollar hardware investment). If I buy Samsung's "starter" bundle, I get Monsters vs. Aliens, which is at least a little better, but that comes with the battery-powered glasses, and I want the better rechargeable ones (or, more likely, I'm holding out for the Xpand X103 glasses, depending on how they get reviewed) which don't come in a bundle like that. And that's it. And I don't consider A Christmas Carol to be an improvement.

Everything else coming out in the immediate future -- Avatar, Coraline, Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs, Alice in Wonderland -- basically all of the worthwhile movies -- is being put out as pack-in exclusives with hardware. Sure, they'll get individual releases eventually, but for the time being, you have to buy a TV or a blu-ray player to get one of them. Which means that anyone who has already invested in 3D hardware is left out in the cold. And even for those who do buy one of these packages -- well, I hope you enjoy your movie, because you probably won't be getting another one for a while. So what's the incentive to spend all that money?

What the hell are these companies thinking? You want a killer app to get 3D blu-ray out there, release Toy Story 3 in 3D. Release those other titles for general sale. Don't lock up the market so tightly that it's not even worthwhile for consumers to invest in it.

[quote name='seanw']Maybe ... because it's Christmas?[/QUOTE]

Yeah, but it's still a crappy movie at any time of the year.
 
arcane93, if you've seen CLOUDY and didn't like it, then no problema, but if you haven't seen and are just guessing you wouldn't like it, I found it to be at least twice as good as either Monster House or Monsters vs. Aliens. It was probably the funniest movie I saw last year.
 
[quote name='seanw']arcane93, if you've seen CLOUDY and didn't like it, then no problema, but if you haven't seen and are just guessing you wouldn't like it, I found it to be at least twice as good as either Monster House or Monsters vs. Aliens. It was probably the funniest movie I saw last year.[/QUOTE]

Eh, maybe it's ok -- I saw lots of trailers and preview footage before it came out, to the point that it felt like I'd seen most of the worthwhile parts of the movie, and it didn't really draw my interest at all -- but you're missing my overall point. My point was that there are exactly two movies that I can currently go out and buy in 3D blu-ray, and a third that I can get if I buy a glasses bundle, and that's it. And none of those movies (or even all three together) are even close to worth the ~$300 investment that I'd have to make to get the two pairs of glasses that would be necessary for my girlfriend and I to watch them (let alone the additional glasses that I'd need if I wanted to have friends over to watch). And, even worse, the market's not getting any better this year. These companies are shooting themselves in the foot and killing their own products by not getting the content out there to support them. All of the fancy viewing technology in the world is worthless if there's nothing to view on it.
 
No, I totally get your point, and I agree that 3D TV is a boondoogle. I've seen it demo'd, and it's very cool, but it's never going to catch on for at-home movie watching. Maybe for gaming, because gamers have already shown they're happy to sit around wearing headgear, but I would bet a household that buys a 3D TV and watches a 3D Super Bowl one year will watch it in 2D the next year. It might be different when glasses-free 3D is invented, but even then, I doubt it's going to prove a long-lived innovation (except for gaming, perhaps).

But, even in 2D, CLOUDY is surprisngly funny.
 
Yeah, it probably is gaming, rather than movies, that will eventually get me to invest. But Toy Story 3 in 3D would definitely go a long way as well, and even if I wasn't investing in the glasses right away, I'd still buy the 3D blu-ray to future-proof my purchase (so far, at least, all of the 3D blu-rays have had 2D versions on them as well). But instead, I'm going to have to think long and hard before buying Toy Story 3 in a 2D blu-ray form, because I know I'll likely want the 3D version at some point down the road, and it's pretty much inevitable that it will come out.

I dunno, I don't think 3D is necessarily going to be short-lived. Maybe it's just because I wear glasses all of the time anyway, but the headgear doesn't really bother me. I mean, I don't need to make a fashion statement while I'm watching TV. Glasses-free 3D will definitely be better (and it actually has already been invented, it's just not feasible at a consumer level yet), but I don't see the glasses as an absolute deal-killer. What are deal-killers right now are 1) cost of entry, and 2) content availability. They really need to work on both, and fast, if they want the technology to get adopted.
 
[quote name='msu89dawgs']I cannot stand non-standard packaging....[/QUOTE]

Me too.

I definitely won't buy that. Will just wait for deals on the standalone Blu Rays.
 
Very nice, thanks for posting! I had not seen this yet.

I missed the Toy Box years ago and how the prices are crazy high. I will definitely want to pick this up when it comes out. I already have Toy Story 1 and 2 on DVD and the Blu-Ray Combo pack, but I don't mind having extras... plus, I don't think the Blu-Rays came with the digital copy for TS1 and TS2, which is nice. Considering the price the blu-rays were released out, it was a good deal anyway.
 
[quote name='Indiana Jones']Is there gonna be a Toy Story 4?[/QUOTE] Toy Story series will continue while Tom Hank is still alive... LOL!
 
[quote name='Indiana Jones']Is there gonna be a Toy Story 4?[/QUOTE]

I wouldn't mind seeing a Toy Story 4 and I think there are plenty of stories they could go with, so I think there is the potential. However, from what I have been reading and stuff, everything points to this being the last one... we shall see!
 
[quote name='dmaul1114']Me too.

I definitely won't buy that. Will just wait for deals on the standalone Blu Rays.[/QUOTE]

To be honest looking at the picture of the box tells me that it'll be the standalone editions just placed in the special packaging. So one can easily discard the special packaging if they so desire.
 
This sounds cool initially but when you realize over half the package is worthless junk. 3 DVDs? 3 Digital Copies? WTF is the point of all this crap?

They might as well start packaging CDs with cassette tapes while they're at it and start calling them "ultimate editions"
 
[quote name='ITDEFX']Wait what? Not to start an argument, but BR has a strong possibility of growing beyond what it can do now. Honestly I would LOVE to see a season of a tv series (in HD) on 1 br disc (quad layer or bigger). Technically the format can support such large capacity (I think they got it around 200gb last I read). So yes, if the movies are encoded properly, all 3 films can be on one disc. I've heard that 3-d movies require more data that it's 2d counterpart so that can be on another disc.

I honestly would not be cheated if everything was on one disc. I think it would make things easier for the consumers. So don't say it "won't happen", when it WILL happen.[/QUOTE]

What the hell is wrong with you? Get off my format and go back to DVD.

Blu-ray is supposed to be a videophile format. When we have dumb people like this proposing overcompression of movies it damages the format. BD50 is what we're stuck with and there is no way you're fitting three movies on a BD50 disc and achieving a 40 Mbps bitrate + lossless audio tracks with all of them.
 
[quote name='Xizer']This sounds cool initially but when you realize over half the package is worthless junk. 3 DVDs? 3 Digital Copies? WTF is the point of all this crap?

They might as well start packaging CDs with cassette tapes while they're at it and start calling them "ultimate editions"[/QUOTE]

You obviously don't have a family. You sound like a total douchebag to be honest. Should all families have bluray players in their vehicles instead of dvd players just because you think they're worthless crap? Should parents buy all their kids bluray players for their rooms instead of cheaper dvd players because you think they're worthless crap? Should people not be allowed to have digital copies for portable devices to watch while at dr's offices, on busses, etc because you think they're worthless crap? I'm sorry your precious videophile eyes would ever have to even look at such disgusting ancient technology, and risk bleeding. But I'll do you a favor man, I'll shoot Disney an email and tell them that catering to families, their target demographic is stupid, because bluray is YOUR format, for videophiles only.
 
[quote name='opterasis']You obviously don't have a family. You sound like a total douchebag to be honest. Should all families have bluray players in their vehicles instead of dvd players just because you think they're worthless crap? Should parents buy all their kids bluray players for their rooms instead of cheaper dvd players because you think they're worthless crap? Should people not be allowed to have digital copies for portable devices to watch while at dr's offices, on busses, etc because you think they're worthless crap? I'm sorry your precious videophile eyes would ever have to even look at such disgusting ancient technology, and risk bleeding. But I'll do you a favor man, I'll shoot Disney an email and tell them that catering to families, their target demographic is stupid, because bluray is YOUR format, for videophiles only.[/QUOTE]

While I sympathize . . . the bigger point for me is that I don't want to have to pay for DVD or digital copies when I buy a blu-ray. Because you can bet that they're upcharging for those, and they're completely worthless to me. And no, I don't have the time or desire to go to the effort of eBaying them or whatever.

How about this?

-- If your primary purpose is to watch the movie in high def on your home theatre system, buy the blu-ray.

-- If your primary purpose is to entertain your kids in the car or in their bedrooms, buy the DVD. If you do end up watching it on your home theatre system at some point, it's not going to look that bad upconverted.

-- If your primary purpose it to watch on your iPod, buy the digital copy.

There, simple. Because really, what are the chances that you're really watching that movie so often that you need it on more than one format? And if you are, you're more than likely in the minority.
 
[quote name='xizer']what the hell is wrong with you? Get off my format and go back to dvd.

Blu-ray is supposed to be a videophile format. When we have dumb people like this proposing overcompression of movies it damages the format. Bd50 is what we're stuck with and there is no way you're fitting three movies on a bd50 disc and achieving a 40 mbps bitrate + lossless audio tracks with all of them.[/quote]

nerd raaaaaaaage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
[quote name='Demolition Man']To be honest looking at the picture of the box tells me that it'll be the standalone editions just placed in the special packaging. So one can easily discard the special packaging if they so desire.[/QUOTE]

Most likely, so that could be an option. But I figure one could get the stand alones cheaper by waiting for deals.

I may just pass on it, I've cut back my movie buying a ton the past 5 years or so. And the Toy Story movies are fringe on being films I need to own as I doubt I'd watch them more than once every 5 years or so. So I may just Netflix them all as I haven't seen 3 yet, and haven't seen the first 2 for quite a while.
 
[quote name='arcane93']

There, simple. Because really, what are the chances that you're really watching that movie so often that you need it on more than one format? And if you are, you're more than likely in the minority.[/QUOTE]

I know lots of children that watch movies on damn near repeat for weeks on end when its something they like, and since this is a kids movie....
 
[quote name='opterasis']I know lots of children that watch movies on damn near repeat for weeks on end when its something they like, and since this is a kids movie....[/QUOTE]

Ok, but are they really watching it on three different formats? If not, buy the one they watch and be done with it. If they are . . . well, they should probably get outside and play more. One way or the other, I don't see why I, and everyone else, should have to pay extra for media formats that we're not going to use just so a few people can keep their kids entertained under every possible circumstance. (I say "a few" because I'm assuming that even the majority of parents do not have their kids watching the same movies on three different formats.)
 
Are prices on these combo packs really higher than regular Blu Rays though? Most I've seen tend to cost about the same--$30-35 MSRP, sales in the $15-20 range after a few months. Pixar movies, just like the DVDs, are just priced higher and seem to go on sale less often and for lesser discounts than most movies. Guess they know parents will pay full price to make their kids happy.

I don't need digital copies as I generally won't watch movies on a small screen, but I don't mind getting a BR and DVD as most of my friends and family don't have BR so that makes it easier to loan out, take to their places and watch etc.
 
Are prices on these combo packs really higher than regular Blu Rays though? Most I've seen tend to cost about the same--$30-35 MSRP, sales in the $15-20 range after a few months. Pixar movies, just like the DVDs, are just priced higher and seem to go on sale less often and for lesser discounts than most movies. Guess they know parents will pay full price to make their kids happy.

I don't need digital copies as I generally won't watch movies on a small screen, but I don't mind getting a BR and DVD as most of my friends and family don't have BR so that makes it easier to loan out, take to their places and watch etc.
 
[quote name='dmaul1114']Are prices on these combo packs really higher than regular Blu Rays though?[/QUOTE]

I'm basing my argument on the few titles that have been released both as combo packs and blu-ray only. Alice in Wonderland, for example, has a list price of $44.99 for the combo pack version and $39.99 for the blu-ray only version, a difference of $5.00 (a 12.5% increase). Granted, the actual retail price difference hasn't always been that much different (on Amazon, the difference between the two versions is $2.50, a 9.8% increase in Amazon's prices), but it's still there.

And sure, $2.50 to $5.00 isn't that much money in the grand scheme of things, but I'm still not in the habit of throwing money in the garbage, which is essentially what I'm doing by dropping extra on formats that I'll never use. And it does add up quickly when you start buying multiple titles.
 
[quote name='opterasis']You obviously don't have a family. You sound like a total douchebag to be honest. Should all families have bluray players in their vehicles instead of dvd players just because you think they're worthless crap? [/QUOTE]

Why does everyone always regurgitate this garbage? Bourgie motherfuckers. DVD players in vehicles are not THAT common. I would be willing to bet 3% or less of people buying these combo packs have children, bourgie features like a DVD player in their damn car, AND they actually use all three together.

[quote name='opterasis']Should parents buy all their kids bluray players for their rooms instead of cheaper dvd players because you think they're worthless crap? Should people not be allowed to have digital copies for portable devices to watch while at dr's offices, on busses, etc because you think they're worthless crap?[/QUOTE]

These people shouldn't be buying Blu-ray copies. What business do people who don't care about picture quality have with a more expensive format that's sole purpose is improved PQ + AQ?

Also I don't see why you can't get a Blu-ray player for yo kid's room. They're like 50 bucks now.

[quote name='RedvsBlue']nerd raaaaaaaage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]

I'm spergin'. Spergin' bout Disney movies.

[quote name='opterasis']I know lots of children that watch movies on damn near repeat for weeks on end when its something they like, and since this is a kids movie....[/QUOTE]

This is not a kids movie. Like most Disney titles, it is a family movie. The scripting and production value of a Pixar title is beyond the level of most adults.
 
[quote name='Xizer']
These people shouldn't be buying Blu-ray copies. What business do people who don't care about picture quality have with a more expensive format that's sole purpose is improved PQ + AQ?
[/QUOTE]

And I'm sure you said that when dvd came out (if you were even old enough then) and I'm sure you'll spout the same snobby nonsense when the NEXT format comes out. Stop being an elitist douchebag and thinking that certain people have no business using a technology. What business do you have telling people who can own what?

And less than 3%? I can promise you that you are WAY off.
 
When did this thread become the why blu is better then dvd vs. it's not crap blah blah blah.

This thread was made to let people know that Amazon is taking preorders for the Toy Story Trilogy.

If you don't want it don't get it. If you do want it then get it.

I have a child so I will be getting this along with the Target edition and the single copy and the dvd/blu copy. Why because I want it and if you think I'm throwing my money away your probably right.:D We shouldn't argue about why it's a waste to have a dvd and dc included.
 
I'm always amazed at the stupid shit people will get pissed off and get into heated arguments on the net over. :lol:

But yeah, I'm sure way more than 3% of people buying this have kids. It's a family movie, yes. Which means many familes. And DVD players in cars are more common than you think. They're cheap as hell for the units that just hang on the seat backs, most mini-vans come with them these days etc. Most people I know with kids who do a lot of driving have at least the cheap seat back hanging ones.
 
[quote name='Friend of Sonic']For the price I got the first two Toy Story movies, I don't mind this at all. If it becomes worth it to own, I will seek out a deal on the trilogy.[/QUOTE]Same here. I got TS, TS2, PatF and two free movie tickets for $7. I can't complain. Looking forward to seeing TS3, again.
 
[quote name='RedvsBlue']nerd raaaaaaaage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]
motivator6650984.jpg

[quote name='Xizer']What the hell is wrong with you? Get off my format and go back to DVD.

Blu-ray is supposed to be a videophile format. When we have dumb people like this proposing overcompression of movies it damages the format. BD50 is what we're stuck with and there is no way you're fitting three movies on a BD50 disc and achieving a 40 Mbps bitrate + lossless audio tracks with all of them.[/QUOTE]

Jesus ........I don't think you need a 40Mbps bitrate for a computer animated movie. Do we really need Lossless audio for the Toy Story trilogy? You just wait and see, there will be movies like this on a single blu ray disc one day.
 
Those two guys are crazy. It's a kiddie movie and you are bitching about 3 formats... oh my. It's one thing for you to do it about Terminator, etc but another to do it about a kiddie movie. Kids watch these movies constantly so having them available everywhere they go is great.

Personally, I am a fan of the digital download version as I can put them on my computer for when I travel for work (i.e. don't have to carry discs around).

As for your 3% comment, every person in my extended family that has a child under the age of 7 has a form of DVD player in their car. Your figure is WAY the fuck OFF

EDIT: One last thing... you mention that pricing would be different... Toy Story 3 2 Disc version list price is 39.99 and Killers 1 Disc version (i.e. Blu Ray only) list price is 39.99, Prince of Persia 1 disc is the same, etc. Think again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='lordopus99']Those two guys are crazy. It's a kiddie movie and you are bitching about 3 formats... oh my. It's one thing for you to do it about Terminator, etc but another to do it about a kiddie movie. Kids watch these movies constantly so having them available everywhere they go is great.

Personally, I am a fan of the digital download version as I can put them on my computer for when I travel for work (i.e. don't have to carry discs around).

As for your 3% comment, every person in my extended family that has a child under the age of 7 has a form of DVD player in their car. Your figure is WAY the fuck OFF

EDIT: One last thing... you mention that pricing would be different... Toy Story 3 2 Disc version list price is 39.99 and Killers 1 Disc version (i.e. Blu Ray only) list price is 39.99, Prince of Persia 1 disc is the same, etc. Think again.[/QUOTE]

The Toy Story, or pixar movies in general were designed for people of all ages. They work as a "Kiddies" movie and a family movie. Not many other studios have talented writers who can come up with something that can be enjoyed by both kids and adults in one sitting. Others have tried, but mostly you will get that "My kids loved it, but I was bored out of my mind" type of review/comments.

The reason why I hate digital copies discs because they are a pain in the butt to deal with if you don't have an ipod/psp or other supported device. The DRM on those things are ridiculous. I would rather just have the BR/DVD combo packs instead.
 
[quote name='ITDEFX']Do we really need Lossless audio for the Toy Story trilogy?[/QUOTE]

Yes we damn well need lossless audio for ALL Pixar films. Pixar always has some amazing surround sound mixes which sound even better with lossless audio.
 
[quote name='ITDEFX']The Toy Story, or pixar movies in general were designed for people of all ages. They work as a "Kiddies" movie and a family movie. Not many other studios have talented writers who can come up with something that can be enjoyed by both kids and adults in one sitting. Others have tried, but mostly you will get that "My kids loved it, but I was bored out of my mind" type of review/comments.

The reason why I hate digital copies discs because they are a pain in the butt to deal with if you don't have an ipod/psp or other supported device. The DRM on those things are ridiculous. I would rather just have the BR/DVD combo packs instead.[/QUOTE]

As much as the Pixar movies are enjoyable for adults, they are marketed towards kids; this is why I call them "kiddie." I have enjoyed other "kiddie" movies from other studios.

I haven't had any issues with digital copy discs. I install them via iTunes. I don't have 5 devices to add it to so DRM is no issue for me. But luckily for you there is a BR/DVD only combo disc as well.
 
[quote name='Xizer']Why does everyone always regurgitate this garbage? Bourgie motherfuckers. DVD players in vehicles are not THAT common. I would be willing to bet 3% or less of people buying these combo packs have children, bourgie features like a DVD player in their damn car, AND they actually use all three together.



These people shouldn't be buying Blu-ray copies. What business do people who don't care about picture quality have with a more expensive format that's sole purpose is improved PQ + AQ?

Also I don't see why you can't get a Blu-ray player for yo kid's room. They're like 50 bucks now.



I'm spergin'. Spergin' bout Disney movies.



This is not a kids movie. Like most Disney titles, it is a family movie. The scripting and production value of a Pixar title is beyond the level of most adults.[/QUOTE]


Xizer, you sir, are a f'ing moron. Even when you make a valid point like the "kids movie" thing, you back it up with something as unbelievably retarded as the "above most adults heads" crap. And all this bull$@!& about "bourgie" people with DVD players in their cars is the most incredibly hypocritical comment I've ever read from someone ranting about the "videophile" quality of "your" format. Good lord, listen to yourself. Utter hypocritical douchebag. :roll:

To quote Eddie Vedder: "If you hate something, don't you do it to."
 
this is win-lose for everyone IMO.... IMDB reports it is 1 Blu Ray of each movie, 1 SD DVD of each movie, 1 Digital Copy of each movie and the final disc is the bonus disc included in both 3 disc and 4 disc version of Toy Story 3.

The good- Any body who bought TS1&2 early like me get the bonus disc not included in this box set

The bad- Anyone who bought the TS1&2 early like me lose out on the digital copies.

crap move Dinsey/Pixar:shame:. On a positive note, I only paid $4 total for the original 2 TS movies and will only pay at most $20 for the 4 disc TS 3... so the $40 difference I would have payed isn't worth the price of 2 digital copies, especially factoring in the loss of 2 bonus disc and 2 CD Rom PC game disc (Target exclusive w TS1&2). But that still doesn't make it OK Disney/Pixar!!!



PS I agree with the above statement. Having all 3 format together is ideal in most families. Myself personally included. Digital copies are great for iPods, laptops ect for on the go. DVD's are perfect for the kids room, portable DVD players and in car DVD players. Blu Rays are perfect for Family time in the living room, where most of us have our only BR player. While ideally I would have a BR player on every TV (which would also all be HD) and in my vehicle, it is way to costly for most families. Having all 3 is a great option to us for little to no cost difference. (I'm guessing it would likely knock off $10 tops if BR+DC only was viable option, likely $15 or $20 if only BR's). Considering it is a cartoon movie, Disney is more likely to go with the cost effective, family friendly release format. Almost (if not) everything animated released on BR is BR+DVD or BR+DVD+DC.
 
Out of all the things to be upset about, losing those worthless "digital copy" discs seems to be the lowest of the low on the list. Even the DVD copies are more useful than those wastes of plastic.

Just make your own "digital copy." Why do you need Disney to pre-package you one? They've given you a source. Rip it and make an encode for whatever shitty little player you're trying to cram a high definition movie onto.

Anyways, I'm not particularly upset about Disney releasing all these overpriced packages crammed full of useless discs - mainly because I've never paid more than $7.50 for a Disney Blu-ray thanks to all the promotions they've always got going on. I WOULD be upset if I actually had to pay full MSRP of $30. HELL no. I'd just keep pirating them instead of giving Disney any money at all. So for now, Disney rocks :D
 
[quote name='batman1939']I don't have a blu ray player in my car....yet, so I still need the DVD for my son.[/QUOTE]

A blu ray player in a car is probably the dumbest thing a car maker can put in a car.... Can you really notice the difference in video quality between sd/br on a 7-10 inch screen? Its just another way for car makers to over charge their customers "Now bring your high def blu ray movies with you where you go!" Kids can't tell the difference...They won't say "I'm not gonna watch it because it's not blu ray."

[quote name='Xizer']Out of all the things to be upset about, losing those worthless "digital copy" discs seems to be the lowest of the low on the list. Even the DVD copies are more useful than those wastes of plastic.

Just make your own "digital copy." Why do you need Disney to pre-package you one? They've given you a source. Rip it and make an encode for whatever shitty little player you're trying to cram a high definition movie onto.

Anyways, I'm not particularly upset about Disney releasing all these overpriced packages crammed full of useless discs - mainly because I've never paid more than $7.50 for a Disney Blu-ray thanks to all the promotions they've always got going on. I WOULD be upset if I actually had to pay full MSRP of $30. HELL no. I'd just keep pirating them instead of giving Disney any money at all. So for now, Disney rocks :D[/QUOTE]

Because not everyone knows how to make a back up copy of a dvd/br disc. It's kind of a trade off.... a fairly easy to install/use , but extremely restrictive system.
 
The collector in me really wants this even though I already have 1 and 2 on blu. The rational part of me that realizes I'm quickly sneaking up on 400 blurays and limited shelf/wall space in my apartment tells me I should pass.
 
[quote name='nycmetsfan']YES! i knew not to bite on the TS1/TS2 deals at TRU a couple of months ago[/QUOTE]


hopefully there will be deals just as good when ts1/2 were out ;)


i really want to know if disney will come out with a ts3 coupon..
 
[quote name='shrike4242']Enough with the format discussions, especially with the sinking to personal attacks. Keep things on-topic, please.[/QUOTE]

Hey. Fu$ck you.
 
1.dvd of 1
2 .dc of 1
3.blu-ray of 1
4.dvd of 2
5. dc of 2
6.blu-ray of 2
7.dvd of 3
8.dc of 3
9.blu-ray of 3
10.extras or maybe 1,2,3 in 3D with a DC of 1,2,3 in 3D

all package in steelbook
 
[quote name='starmask2k3']1.dvd of 1
2 .dc of 1
3.blu-ray of 1
4.dvd of 2
5. dc of 2
6.blu-ray of 2
7.dvd of 3
8.dc of 3
9.blu-ray of 3
10.extras or maybe 1,2,3 in 3D with a DC of 1,2,3 in 3D

all package in steelbook[/QUOTE]
how do u know its a steelbook?
 
[quote name='Indiana Jones']Is there gonna be a Toy Story 4?[/QUOTE]

It looks that way considering....

1. It made a shit load of money at the BO....

2. the writers crafted the story/ending so the toys can have new adventures under the care of the new owner.... good grief you would think buzz and woody would be damaged by now :|

so yes, TS4...in what 3 or 4 years?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='ITDEFX']It looks that way considering....

1. It made a shit load of money at the BO....

2. the writers crafted the story/ending so the toys can have new adventures under the care of the new owner.... good grief you would think buzz and woody would be damaged by now :|

so yes, TS4...in what 3 or 4 years?
[/QUOTE]


Pixar needs to do incredibles 2 first.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='xeno']Pixar needs to do incredibles 2 first.[/QUOTE]

and incredible 1 on blu-ray
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top