Deader2818
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 31 (100%)
Was worth it for Zelda at the end.
Really the point they have been driving with Zelda is that its a huge, seamless open world.I thought it made Zelda look boring, they had to make conversation while waiting for Link to reach his destination, reminded me of riding the gryphons in World of Warcraft.
Falling for the bait here, but not like much new was shown except from Nintendo.No Xbox exclusives at all, nice!
I dont think the show was bad but it went on for too long. I would have liked to see something from Quantum Break or Scalebound.I thought the show was actually quite good. Yeah it had some issues with it, but given that this is the first year Geoff has put together something like that himself I'd say he did a good job.
Microsoft must have had no confidence in the show. They were a complete no-show aside from Conan only plugging Xbox One games and the one Sunset Overdrive advertisement. It was a massive missed opportunity from them when Nintendo appeared to be heavily supporting the show and while Sony kind of held back for their own conference at least they came and showed a couple of things.
I'd be really upset by this if it were 1992.
I think its a pretty big get, its one of the best fighters ever made. But Sony should be careful MS can outspend them if they want to start a third party buying war.I'd be really upset by this if it were 1992.
It's not the entire game, so it's a way to see what the game will be like before you play it. But also, even having seen the game once, you can choose to make different decisions during your own playthrough. Most of the people who saw the Tales premiere last week didn't go home and not want to play it any more.This has nothing to do with you personally, but I cannot fathom why anyone would want to watch streams of those games unless the person had no intention of ever playing the games themselves. The story is the game in the case of Telltale.
Valid points. A sensible Telltale fan who knew they were going to experience those games would be silly to watch anything more than the trailers for those games.Chubbyninja, I am completely with you on that. I have watched EastX stream games multiple times in the past. What I was saying is that, for me personally, I'd prefer to play this specific style of game without seeing them in action due to the fact that almost all the fun is derived from experiencing the stories.
In this case, I also am already highly familiar with how the games play due to owning many Telltale games. But I do not disagree with your point whatsoever.
The only reason I'd watch somebody play a Telltale game is after I had played it to see how they tackle the various choices and see how it differs from my own, though I'd say something like Heavy Rain would be better stream material on that front.Chubbyninja, I am completely with you on that. I have watched EastX stream games multiple times in the past. What I was saying is that, for me personally, I'd prefer to play this specific style of game without seeing them in action due to the fact that almost all the fun is derived from experiencing the stories.
In this case, I also am already highly familiar with how the games play due to owning many Telltale games. But I do not disagree with your point whatsoever.
That is certainly a fun thing about streaming them, seeing different choices played out. But also some of you guys who maybe don't watch Twitch streams much might not realize, a big part of the appeal of Twitch is listening to the Twitch host's commentary and chatting with fellow viewers.The only reason I'd watch somebody play a Telltale game is after I had played it to see how they tackle the various choices and see how it differs from my own, though I'd say something like Heavy Rain would be better stream material on that front.
Yea if it was an exclusive I would expect MS to advertise like crazy after the whole timed exclusive fiasco and avoiding that questionWould have to see actual confirmation on that. Was stated several times that it was a timed exclusive unless something has changed since then.
What did he tweet? And it would not come as a shock to me if they fully locked this up.When the news broke about Rise of the Tomb Raider back in August in the original website leak it showed Microsoft as the publisher, that page was later updated to Square as the publisher and that is what further added to the confusion about the exclusivity deal. So either Greenberg is still out of the know going off the original error, or Microsoft has renegotiated the deal into possibly full exclusive. I would think the Greenberg would be in the know and his tweet would be accurate, but it wouldn't be the first time he was full of it. By the way when is Phil going to fire that guy, he is like one of the last people still bringing toxicity to the brand, he really needs to be silenced or fired.
Its what was posted earlier. Someone asked who was publishing Rise of the Tomb Raider and he said Microsoft but there is no proof of this.What did he tweet? And it would not come as a shock to me if they fully locked this up.
360 is supposed to come out the same time as 360. I feel like if the timed deal was pc later mircosoft would have just said that as that doesn't hurt them really.The more I think about the more I feel like TR wont come out on the PS4. Its timed but will only come out on PC and 360 at a later date.
I dont think the 360 and X1 versions are coming out at the same time if that's what you mean. Im expecting them to announce full exclusive soon now that sony has SF.360 is supposed to come out the same time as 360. I feel like if the timed deal was pc later mircosoft would have just said that as that doesn't hurt them really.
Theyes were both announced for holiday 2015. Unless you think the 360 verison is going to be delayed.I dont think the 360 and X1 versions are coming out at the same time if that's what you mean. Im expecting them to announce full exclusive soon now that sony has SF.
Depends on the wording but not really.Would that publishing deal lock it up as a console exclusive?
Maybe. If Microsoft had bought them or they went back to them as a publisher. Before EA bought them they were an independent 3rd party developer that used many different publishers to publish their games.Well BioWare was purchased by EA, so it wouldn't be far fetched to say ME 2/3 would have been Xbox exclusives.
What I hate about the article is that they still don't fully clear up the exclusive part, because they again end with it being a "Timed" exclusive... So I guess MS is publishing in exchange for a timed exclusive, but what "publishing" in this case may be different. I.E. they are helping with advertising, distribution costs, or development costs... This is all super weird!It looks like Greenberg was correct in that matter (Or partially correct). IGN Posted an article and according to the statement they got from Square Enix Microsoft is publishing the Xbox version of the game.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/09/rise-of-the-tomb-raider-is-being-published-by-microsoft
yea they said that in the IGN article, that MS would not comment on what Publishing is going towards... if it's development then its a full exclusive, but it could just be marketing or even distribution in exchange for a timed exclusiveIt could just be paying for the publishing costs on their system and marketing and not like SF V or Bayonetta 2 where Sony and Nintendo are actually helping pay for the development cost as well as help to develop the game.
Honestly, till Microsoft actually comes out and says that Tomb Raider is a Microsoft exclusive and will never be on PS4/PS3 its still just a timed deal.